Between the Bombs: From Hiroshima to Nagasaki

11 August, 2008

“I pray from my heart for the repose of the souls of those who died in the atomic bombing, and pledge to work untiringly for the elimination of nuclear weapons and for the achievement of everlasting world peace.” - Tomihisa Taue, Mayor of Nagasaki[i]

 On 6 August 1945 at 8:15 am local time, the US launched the world’s first nuclear attack on Hiroshima, Japan[ii] with a single uranium-235 bomb, dropped from a B-29.  Detonating 575 meters directly above Shima Hospital,[iii] the bomb leveled most of the city, bustling with unsuspecting Japanese going about their usual morning activities.   Equivalent in destructive power to 11.4 million kilograms of TNT,[iv] the blast killed an estimated 70,000 human beings literally in a flash, and burned “the exposed parts of people’s bodies as far as three kilometers away, and setting fire to their thin clothing.”[v]

 

On 9 August 1945 at 10:58 am, the US dropped a second atomic bomb on Nagasaki[vi] at a point 500 meters above and 152 meters south of the Mitsubishi Steel Works,[vii] causing the immediate deaths of an additional 50,000 persons, with the effects of the blast extending ”beyond a radius of 12 kilometers.”[viii]  The execution of this second nuclear attack only three days after the Hiroshima bombing raises many questions about US motives.[ix]

 

What happened between those fateful days of 6 and 9 August 1945, when the US perpetrated the world’s first two nuclear attacks?  Did US leaders make any attempts to avoid the bombing of Nagasaki, the second use within three days of the dreadful and devastating atomic fission weapon?

 

Was Japan’s rejection of the Potsdam Declaration[x] of 26 July 1945 with the US demand for Japan’s “unconditional surrender,” including the abdication of Emperor Hirohito, a factor in the second attack?   Or, is it possible that the second bombing at Nagasaki had less to do with forcing a Japanese surrender and more to do with sending a clear message to the Soviet Union to stay out of Japan, after declaring war on 8 August 1945? 

 

Initial Japanese reaction to the Hiroshima bombing was one of disbelief, due to the implausible reports citing extensive casualties and nightmarish destruction consistent with a massive US air strike, yet only a few planes had been observed.  Japanese leaders sought alternative explanations, such as the accidental detonation of explosives, but these were quickly discarded when a Japanese staff officer dispatched by plane to Hiroshima confirmed the monumental proportions of carnage and destruction.[xi]

 

The razing of Hiroshima was not unique, as the US had carpet-bombed Dresden, Germany in February of 1945, killing over 100,000 of its citizens under the pretext of destroying a communications center.  The incendiary bombing generated a firestorm, created by the merging of smaller fires, which magnified death and destruction well beyond that caused by the bombing itself.  Hiroshima paralleled Dresden in the number of civilians killed, the firestorm ignited and the devastation wrought, the only difference being that nuclear technology enabled a single plane to destroy what previously had required at least a thousand.

 

The bombing of Hiroshima was not the first US attack on the Japanese mainland.  Previously, the US had viciously firebombed Tokyo on 9 and 10 March 1945, causing the loss of 100,000 lives and leveling an area twice the size of New York’s Manhattan Island.[xii]  Following the incendiary attacks on Tokyo, the US firebombed Kobe, Nagoya, and Osaka.[xiii]

 

Could the second attack have been carried out to test the plutonium-239 bomb and to compare its destructive power to that of the uraniun-235 bomb dropped on Hiroshima?  This seems highly unlikely, and certainly would have been redundant, since a plutonium-239 implosion weapon was used in the 16 July 1945 “Trinity” test at the Almogordo, New Mexico Bombing range.  Furthermore, the “gun-type” uranium-235 weapon dropped on Hiroshima was itself never tested before deployment.[xiv]

 

Was a second nuclear atrocity necessary to expedite a Japanese surrender?  For that matter, was the first bombing of Hiroshima necessary?  According to NY Times military analyst Hanson Baldwin, “the answer is almost certainly negative.” [xv]

 

The Americans had broken the Japanese code and knew that Japan was seeking peace negotiations with the US through its Ambassador in Moscow.  A 13 July 1945 dispatch from Japan’s Foreign Minister Shigenori Togo to Ambassador Sato in Moscow indicated that the only obstacle to peace was the arrogant US insistence on “unconditional surrender.”[xvi]  Had the US dropped its demand for the Japanese emperor to step down at that time, as it ultimately did, up to 220,000 Japanese lives could have been spared.[xvii]

 

Confirming that the US nuclear attacks on Japan were intended as a strong signal to the Soviet Union, British scientist P. M. S. Blackett states the atomic bombings were really “the first major operation of the cold diplomatic war…” And, of course, in keeping with US standard propaganda procedure, President Truman announced that Hiroshima was chosen because it was a “military target.”[xviii]  More plausibly, Hiroshima was selected because it was relatively untouched by previous US bombing and hence would more effectively showcase the power of the new A-bomb.[xix]

 

In the aftermath of the Hiroshima bombing, Foreign Minister Togo pressed for an immediate surrender under the terms of the Potsdam Declaration.  On 8 August, he managed to convince Prime Minister Suzuki to convene a meeting of Principals of the Supreme Council for Direction of War on 9 August.   Unfortunately, his efforts proved futile, as the news of the Soviet declaration of war, followed shortly by the second US nuclear attack on the city of Nagasaki arrived on the morning of 9 August.[xx]

 

On the US side, Secretary of War Henry Stimson had a meeting with President Truman at 10:45 am on 8 August 1945.  During the meeting, Stimson showed President Truman evidence from both US and Japanese sources of the extent of the destruction at Hiroshima and emphasized “the importance of kindness or tact in handling this matter [of Japan’s surrender].”[xxi] However, it appears that neither President Truman nor Secretary of War Stimson made any efforts to stop the second atomic bombing.

 

The 20th Air Force Headquarters on Guam ordered the second nuclear attack on Japan with Field Order No.17 issued on 8 August 1945.[xxii]  Kokura was the intended primary target, but after three attempts and 50 minutes spent waiting for smoke and haze to clear, the commander of the B-29 decided to attack the secondary target of Nagasaki.[xxiii]

 

The authority for the second bombing had already been included in the original order of 25 July 1945 drafted by General Leslie Groves and issued by Acting Chief of Staff General Thomas Handy.[xxiv]  With the exception of the US President or the Secretary of War, no one could have stopped the second attack that resulted in an additional 74,000 lives lost in Nagasaki, not to mention an unknown number of US prisoners of war held in a camp 2 km north of the city center.[xxv] 

 

General Leslie Groves, the head of the Manhattan project—the code name for development of the atomic bomb—hinted at his intention to drop at least two bombs on Japan by a remark in response to a comment made after the successful Trinity A-bomb test that “the war was over.”  “Yes,” replied Groves, “after we drop TWO bombs on Japan.”[xxvi]  It would seem that General Groves had no intention of stopping with just one bombing, and had even planned for further nuclear attacks to commence after 17 August 1945, before being stopped by President Truman.[xxvii]

 

It is incumbent upon us during the days “between the bombs” to reflect on the senseless and unnecessary slaughter of 220,000 human beings because of American hubris and to rededicate ourselves to the worldwide elimination of nuclear weapons.  This is urgently needed now at a time when once again, the US war machine, with its 9,000 nuclear weapons,[xxviii] seems obsessed with targeting the next victim in its bombsights, namely Iran.  May we all take Mayor Tomihisa Taue’s pledge.

 

Yuram Abdullah Weiler

2008-08-11

 
Endnotes

Posted by yuram 08:20 | Iran , United States | Comment(0) | Permalink

• Main
• archives
• Albums
• Links

• Quantum Change or Short Changed?
• Reversing the Raw Deal
• The End of Enron Economics?
• 9/11 Seven Years Later and Questions Remain
• Once Again, It’s About The Oil
• Between the Bombs: From Hiroshima to Nagasaki
• Iran’s Nuclear Program or US Militarism?
• A Special Relationship: The US and Israel
• Merchants for the Angel of Death
• It’s the Foreign Policy, Stupid

• November 2008
• October 2008
• September 2008
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• January 2008
• June 2007
• May 2007
• February 2007
• January 2007
• December 2006
• November 2006
• October 2006
• September 2006
• August 2006
• July 2006
• May 2006
• April 2006
• March 2006
• February 2006
• December 2005
• November 2005

• United States [15]
• General [9]
• Palestine [11]
• Iran [8]
• Lebanon [4]
• Middle East [3]
• Iraq [7]

• RSS 2.0
• Atom 0.3