Aqeedah Issues that Harun Yahya has

23 January, 2009

Exposing Haarun Yahyaa
By Br. Abu RumaisahAssalaamualaykum warahmathullahi wabarakaathu

Dearest brothers and sisters the following is written as a clarification of the path of Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah. It is not a personal attack on the named individual, rather an attack on the belief and methodology professed in his works.

If you disagree then please bring your proof with Authentic Explanation. and email it to comments@....

The main reason for this series of postings is to steer our brothers and sisters clear of the works of someone who is gaining popularity throughout the world in many languages.

His Belief in Wahdatul Wujood

Firstly we will just define the term to those who are unaware of it; Wahdatul–Wujood means linguistically:
“What ever is existing in the entire universe, it has no existence, what ever exists than it is none other than Allaah.”
This means that everything that is visible to the naked eye is nothing but Allaah; there is no distinction between the creator and the creation. The example that can be found regarding Wahdatul–Wujood is:
“The example of Wahdatul–Wujood is like an ocean, and the bubbles are the human beings and all other things that exist, so the example of Allaah is like the ocean and the example of the creation is the example of the bubbles.”
It is obvious and apparent that bubbles are a part of the ocean and it is also regarded as water. So from the above examples the Sufis abolish the belief that there is a distinction between the Creator and the creation. They have innovated the concept of Wahdatul–Wujood, a concept that is neither established from the Qur’aan, the Sunnah, the Companions (radi–Allaahu ‘anhum ajma’een), the Taabi’een, those who came after the Taabi’een, nor from any of the Imaams of Sunnah.


It must also be noticed that to adhere to such a belief obliges the human being to believe in the concept of Hulool: being attributed to Allaah with His creation. (We seek refuge from Allaah from such a heretical, filthy and evil belief).

So O dear Muslim you have come to know that the Sufis belief in the concept of Wahdatul–Wujood necessitates the concept of Hulool, which is for Allaah to indwell into all things and to be part of them, and this is a belief that has been innovated by them and we seek refuge from Allaah!

What follows is proof that Haarun Yahya is upon this false belief and that he dares to Mock Ahlus Sunnah, and then to finish off, we have a series of quotes from the Imaam’s of the sunnah reinforcing the CORRECT belief.

Haarun Yahya says about the following verse (Quotes in red):

"...some people have no genuine understanding of God and so they imagine Him as a being present somewhere in the heavens and not really intervening in worldly affairs. The basis of this logic actually lies in the thought that the universe is an assembly of matter and God is "outside" this material world, in a far away place. In some false religions, belief in God is limited to this understanding." [Evolution Deciet sixt edit Page 223]

'God is surely "everywhere" and encompasses all.'[Evolution Deciet sixt edit Page 223]

What is said above is something that needs clarifying and looking into as many Muslims especially those who have deviated ideas like the author in question will start to cry out. Hence we will suffice in just presenting the proof and then let it be upon the reader to decide.

The belief that Allaah is preasent in the heavens is according to Haaroon Yahya; part of a false religion “In some false religions, belief in Allah is limited to this understanding."

So my dear brothers and sisters ask your self what religion is Harron Yahya following?? Read the following then I ask you to ask yourselves are we the people upon a FALSE RELIGION?

Mu'aawiyah ibn al-Hakam said:
"I had a slave-girl who tended sheep for me in the direction of Uhud and Al-Jawaaniyaah and I came one day and found that a wolf had taken one of the sheep, and I am a man from the children of Aadam, I became angry as they do, but I hit her very hard. So I came to the Prophet sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam and he made me aware of the seriousness of that, so I said: O Messenger of Allaah, shall I free her? He said: Bring her. So I brought her and he said to her: Where is Allaah? She said: 'Above the sky.' He said: Who am I? She said: 'You are Allaah's Messenger.' He said: Free her for she is a Believer." [SAHEEH MUSLIM]
(i) The hadeeth establishes the unequivocal validity of asking the question: 'Where is Allaah?'


(ii) The only acceptable answer from a Believer to the question 'Where is Allaah?' is to say 'Is (above) the heaven' since the Prophet sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam himself accepted this answer and did not criticise it in any way. To give an answer other than this would be to venture into the realms of speculation.

Aboo Mutee' al-Hakam ibn 'Abdullah al-Balkee said:
"I asked Aboo Haneefah about the one who says: 'I do not know whether my Lord is in the sky or the earth.'" So he said: 'He is a kaafir, for Allaah, the Most High, says: and His Throne is above the heavens.' So I said: "If he says: 'I say that He ascended above the Throne but I do not know whether the Throne is in the heavens or the earth.'" He said: 'If he denies that He is above the sky then he is a kaafir.' (Sharh 'Aqeedah at-Tahaweeyah p.288 of ibn Abil-'Izz al-Hanafee, and Mukhtasar al-'Uluww no.118 of adh-Dhahabee)
If we take the above statement we can say that Haarun Yahya is a KAFIR, but we leave that for the people of knowledge, however we ask the muslims who read his books to ask themselves whether they are going to help promote Kufr by buying his books??


As Allaah said:
"help one another to birr and taqwa and do not help one another to ithm and udwaan"
Does advising from or selling or promoting his books make you part of this. Also our Prophet sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam said:
"Whoever sees an evil then let him change it with his hand, if you cannot then with tongue, if you cannot then with the heart, that's the weakest of eemaan."
Why did Imaam Aboo Haneefah (rahimahullah) impute with Kufr one who does not know whether Allaah is in the heavens or on earth?


Ibn Abil-'Izz writes:
"Do not pay any attention to those who reject this narration from those who ascribe themselves to the Madhhab of Aboo Haneefah, for a group of the Mu'tazilah and other than them attribute themselves to him but differ with him in a large number of his beliefs. And those who oppose some of the beliefs of Maalik, ash-Shaafi'ee and Ahmad also attribute themselves to them. And the story of Aboo Yusuf asking Bishr al-Mareesee to repent when he denied that Allaah is above His Throne is well known, reported by 'Abdur-Rahmaan ibn Abee Haatim and others." (Sharh 'Aqeedah at-Tahaawiyyah, p.288)
Allaah, the Most High, says:
"Behold! Allaah said: O 'Eesa, I will take you and raise you up to Myself." (Soorah Aali-'Imraan 3:55)
"They fear their Lord who is above (fawq) them." (Soorah an-Nahl 16:50)
The Messenger of Allaah sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam said:
“Do you not trust me and I am the trustworthy servant of Him Who is above the sky. The news of heaven comes to me in the morning and the evening.” [al-Bukhaaree and Muslim from Aboo Sa'eed al-Khudree]
The Prophet sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam also said:
“Those who are merciful will be shown mercy by the Most High. Have mercy upon those on the earth, then He who is in the sky will have mercy upon you.” [Ahmad, Aboo Daawood, al-Bukhaaree in at-Tareekh al-Kabeer, al-Haakim who authenticated it and adh-Dhahabee agreed. At-Tirmidhee graded it as hasan saheeh in his Sunan]
Also the lengthy hadeeth in which the Prophet sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam describes the journey of the righteous soul through the heavens after death:
“…thereafter it is taken up to the sky which is then opened for it. It is said: 'Who is this?' So (the Angel) says: 'It is so and so.' It is said: 'Welcome to the blessed soul,' and it does not cease to be referred to as this until it reaches the heaven in (above) which is Allaah, the Most High.” [Ahmad, as well as al-Haakim who declared it to be authentic to the standard of al-Bukhaaree and Muslim]
Imaam Maalik said:
"Allaah is above the sky and His Knowledge is in every place, not being absent from anything." [Aboo Dawood in al-Masaa'il p.263, al-Aajuree in ash-Sharee'ah p.289, and others]
Imaam ash-Shaafi'ee said:
"The saying which I hold regarding the Sunnah and which I found those whom I have seen holding such as Sufyaan, Maalik and others, is affirmation of the testification that none has the right to be worshipped but Allaah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allaah, that Allaah is above His Throne over His heaven, He draws near to His creation as He wishes and descends to the lowest heaven as He wishes..." [Mukhtasar al-'Uluww no.118 of adh-Dhahabee from Abu Thawr and Abu Shu'aib, both reporting from ash-Shaafi'ee]
Imaam al-Awzaa'ee (d.157H) said:
"We, whilst the students of the Successors were many, would say that indeed Allaah, the Most Perfect, is above His Throne and we believe in what is related in the Sunnah about the Attributes." [al-Baihaaqee in al-Asmaa was-Sifaat (p.408). Ibn Hajar graded its isnaad as being jayyid in Fath al-Baaree 13/406]
Shaykh ul-Islaam Abdullaah ibn al-Mubaarak (d.181H) said:
"He is above the seventh heaven above His Throne and we do not say as the Jahmiyyah say: 'He is here on the earth'." [Khalq Af'aalul-'Ibaad no.13 of al-Bukhaaree, ar-Radd 'alal Mareesee pp.24, 103 and ar-Radd 'alal-Jahmiyyah p.50 of ad-Daarimee and 'Abdullaah ibn Ahmad in as-Sunnah pp.7, 25, 35 and 72]
THIS IS JUST THE TIP OF THE ICE BERG REGARDING THE AQEEDAH OF AHLUS SUNNAH BUT THOSE WHO HAVE UNCERTAINTY THEN THEY WILL FOLLOW WHATEVER SUITS THEIR DESIRES.

Posted by ummammaar 19:37 | Innovations, misconceptions,etc. | Comment(0) | Permalink

The Star and Crescent - Is the Symbol "of" Islam Shirk?

29 November, 2008

The Star and Crescent

- Is the Symbol of Islam Shirk?

By Rafael Narbaez Jr.

The city of Byzantium (Constantinople, modern Istanbul) was dedicated to Diana, goddess of the hunt, and the crescent was the symbol of Diana. In 330 CE, Constantine rededicated the city to the virgin Mary, whose star symbol was added to the previous crescent. When the Turks took possession of Constantinople, they found lots of crescent flags and adopted it as a symbol of good omen.

"The star and crescent" was first hoisted on behalf of the Muslims by Mahomet II after the capture of Constantinople in 1453 CE. Prior to that, it was common on the arm of knight and esquires. A star within a crescent was a badge of Richard I, 250 years before Constantinople fell. They quit using it when it became the banner of Muslims. It has been used more and more ever since by Muslims in a way to identify themselves.

INTRODUCTION

I remember that as a former Jehovah's Witness, one of the things that we were taught to always stay away from was the use of religious symbols. It was thought that this would lead to some form of idol worship that could eventually compromise our worship of the one true God. We were not permitted to wear religious icons like the cross because, in the first place, we never believed that Jesus Christ was hung on the cross. Secondly, Jehovah's Witnesses do not believe in idols and they feel that the use of these in religious worship is idolatry.

Neither could we wear anything that might be perceived as showing allegiance to a particular government, nation or political group. We could not keep a flag of any nation in our homes. We were not permitted to wear a patch of the American flag on our clothing or any of our possessions. We did not vote, sing the national anthem or recite the pledge of allegiance.

They warned that the Bible clearly states that "you shall have no other gods before me." It also states, "you shall not make for yourself any carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth."

You can imagine my concern, when, as I was embracing Islam, I became aware of the use of "the star and crescent." My concern was genuine; I did not want to offend God. I did not want to interpret that I gave allegiance to anyone except Allah. I remember asking some brothers about what "the star and crescent" symbol meant. "Oh, it's nothing to be concerned about," they said. "It just represents the Muslim." One brother, I remember, drew me a clearer picture. "Well," he said, "you know how the Christians use the cross and the Jews, the star of David? We use "the star and crescent" to identify ourselves world-wide as Muslims."

Although I didn't make it a big issue, I decided to do some research and find out for myself. I was not going to stumble over this issue, but at the same time, I didn't want to do anything that would offend God. The following is some information that I found in my research and I wanted to pass it on to you. Afterwards, I'd like to share with you an interesting view on this matter from a personal perspective and why I think it's important to consider how we view the use of the star and crescent.

HISTORY

During the Byzantine Empire, the city of Byzantium (a.k.a. Constantinople and Istanbul) was dedicated to Diana, goddess of the hunt. The crescent was the symbol of Diana. In 330 CE, Constantine rededicated the city to the virgin Mary, whose star symbol was added to the previous crescent. When the Turks took possession of Byzantium, they found lots of crescent flags and adopted it as a symbol of good omen. In 339 BC, Philip of Macedon (the father of Alexander the Great) was thwarted from overtaking the city of Byzantium because his army was spotted due to a bright crescent moon.

"The star and crescent" was first hoisted on behalf of the Muslims by Mahomet II after the capture of Constantinople in 1453 CE. Prior to that, it was common on the arm of knight and esquires. A star within a crescent was a badge of Richard I, 250 years before Constantinople fell. They quit using it when it became the banner of Muslims. It has been used more and more ever since by Muslims in a way to identify themselves. Sultan Othman, founder of the Ottoman empire, had a dream of crescent moon growing bigger and bigger until it reached East to West.

Banners or flags are what people customarily unite around or behind. It may or may not represent some characteristic about them. The twelve tribes of Israel, for example, each had it's own banner or symbol, e.g. 'The Lion of Judah,' etc. An insignia could represent one's cause, philosophy, belief or attitude; whether religious or secular. The colour and the symbol's use on national flags is also most interesting. Red is the Ottomon (Turkish) colour and thus, a star and crescent on a field of red. In Mauritania, green stands for prosperity and hope. The star represents the people. On the Pakistani flag, the crescent is for progress and the star for enlightenment.

THE PROPHET'S FLAG

As to what the actual Holy Prophet used, we find some very interesting information. It has been reported that the Holy Prophet's first standard or flag was a black flag to contradict the white flag of the Quraish, who had a black eagle on it as well. The earliest such flag or banner used by the Prophet was a sable curtain which hung in the chamber of his wife, Ayesha (may Allah be pleased with her). In the centre, the Prophet attached a white cloth which was a turban that he captured from the city of Boreide. On it was written the inscription, Nasr um min Allah, which meant "the help of Allah". Most appropriate. One can see how powerful a symbol this was to be used as a banner or flag. In modern times, some governments, like Saudi Arabia, prefer not to use the star and crescent of the Turkish government, but instead use a plain green field with the Shahadah on it in white. There is also a white sword underneath. Several modern day Muslims use the Shahadah in white on a green field as their way of showing they are Muslim. It was reported that the Prophet's favourite colour was green; which incidentally represents life.

FLAG OF SYMBOL AS AUTHORITY

But, why all this fuss about a flag or a symbol anyway? In particular, the star and the crescent? Why is it so important to search for a more profound meaning to what it means and what it stands for? Is it really that big of a deal? I mean, it's just a flag or a symbol, right?

Well, the truth of the matter is that symbols and especially flags, have more than just a casual, passing representation. They actually stand for something and have a definite meaning. A stop sign, for example, isn't there just to blend in with the landscaping. It represents the law, the authority. It requires some action from you every time you come to it and that action is to stop. It also means there is a reaction from it if you choose not to stop there and that is that you will be cited for failing to obey that sign or symbol.

THE AMERICAN FLAG

With that in mind, let's look at the flag of the United States. This is not the time to go through a two hundred year history of all the changes in the flag and how it got to it's present form, however, since we live in this country, I think it's appropriate to understand a little about it.

The first American flag was one that had thirteen stars in a circle on a blue field with a background of thirteen alternating red and white stripes. The thirteen stars represented the thirteen original colonies that became the United States of America. Why stars? Why not thirteen trees or thirteen fish? Perhaps because a bright star is such a beautiful thing to behold. Remember the last time there was a clear night and you looked up at the sky to admire the bright starry sky? They seem so near and yet they are so far away.

Muslims appreciate stars very much because they realize that stars do fulfil many wonderful purposes. They are both beautiful and a way to guide us in a time when perhaps other navigational instruments fail us. But, as Muslims, when we look at a star or any other work of beauty, we always appreciate the Creator, Al-Khaliq, more than the creation.

As the United states added more states they added a star for each new state. Thus, today we have fifty states and also fifty stars on our flag. The stars are laid on a blue field; blue being the colour of truth. The red stripes stand for the blood that was spilled in establishing our republic. The white stands for purity, cleanliness, holiness. Put all together, one can see how easily it would be for one to perceive that these fifty states, America, is to be admired because it was conceived with the blood of righteousness; with the purest and holiest of intentions and it stands for truth and goodness. You can trust her. You can depend on her. She will guide you to success and prosperity. See how she sparkles and shines? Follow her.

LOYALTY AND ALLEGIANCE

Some people might argue that such reasoning is absurd. That respecting the flag does not mean giving loyalty to it as you would the country or government. That it does not mean that we show the same allegiance to it that we show our country and that it certainly does not take the place of God for guidance in our lives. Reality, however, does indicate that people look at the flag and the symbols on it with more than just respect and that they do view what it symbolizes in the same manner that we've described above. Let's look at an example.

Growing up in America, I remember the first thing we did every day in school before class started was recite the Pledge of Allegiance. But allegiance to who? To our God and Creator, Allah? Well, let's see. The Pledge of Allegiance says, "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands". To demonstrate our loyalty, love, affection and allegiance to the flag and the republic or country "for which it stands", we would place our right hand over our heart. Contrary to what some people may believe, the oath of allegiance is to the country or government because the flag stands for or represents exactly that and you have just pledged your allegiance to both, the flag and the republic or country; they are one and the same. I've always admired some brothers who would tell me that when they received their United States citizenship and had to pledge allegiance to the flag, they would be pledging allegiance to Allah, instead.

Some persist in their view, however, stating that, recently the United States Supreme court upheld the decision that, burning the American flag is permissible because it is a right of expression. The burning of the country, on the other hand, would not be construed as a freedom of expression, they argue, but as an act to overthrow the government of the United States. Therefore, they cannot be one and the same according to them. The pledge of allegiance to the flag, in their opinion, is not the same as a pledge of allegiance to the country. Sounds good, but when you take into consideration the people of this country as a whole, I think you will find that the overwhelming majority feel that burning the flag is wrong and offensive to them because it represents a total disregard and disrespect to the country or government "for which it stands."

Also, consider this. If they don't mean the same thing, then, why is it that on the insignias of uniforms, cars or property of local, state or federal peace officers; or even of athletes, or anyone that represents our country, the decal or insignia is of an American flag? If they don't mean the same thing, then, why don't they have an insignia of the map of the U.S. or just the words, United States of America. Another thing. When someone, like a military veteran or government official dies, they drape the American flag over his coffin. Do they say that the individual died for his flag or gave his life for his flag? No. They say he died for his country. The reason is because the flag, symbol or insignia stands for or represents the government.

Those of us who have had the misfortune of being under colonial rule at one time, remember all too well the phrase "loyal to the Crown", meaning the British, of course. How quickly we forget. The fact is that to the great majority of people in this country, and around the world, for that matter, the flag, symbol or insignia and the country do stand for the same thing.

TWO EXAMPLES

Another thing to consider when speaking of flags and the country or people that they represent is: if a country or people separate or abolish the use of certain symbols does it necessarily mean that they have changed their views or stands on certain issues.

For example, hardly anyone can argue the fact that the 'swastika' is a symbol for what nazism stood for: a pure Aryan race and all that implies. That symbol still represents that ideology even to this day. In all fairness to the German people, they have taken the initiative to separate themselves from such racism by changing the symbols of their flag as well as rejecting the ideology of a supreme white race.

Some will argue that the United States has done the same thing by insisting that the southern states remove and make illegal the old Confederate flag with the symbol of the 'stars and bars' because of what it once represented, namely, slavery and the oppression of black people. Some states, however, still persist in using the Confederate flag. Some people of the South are even more vocal and adamant about the continual use of the Confederate flag.

Taking the two examples just given, we see that in Germany, although it no longer supports the theory that a German white Aryan race is superior it still denies equal rights and justice to many of its citizenry, e.g., the Turkish population and others. The United States is really no better off. She has not taken sufficient steps to educate its populace on the issue of racism and tolerance and has consistently shied away from providing continual legislation that would eradicate such racism by making it absolutely illegal to act in such a manner. In fact at the present time, we see the United States reversing herself on what little legislation it once had that addressed such issues. We see with both countries, especially the US a double-tongue policy of "we're not better than you, you're just not as good as us."

In Spanish there is a saying that says, "Tanto peca el que mata la waca, como el que detiene la pata." This was a saying contrived in the old cattle rustling days. It means, "Just as guilty is he who kills the cow, as he who ties down it's hoofs." If the people of a country are not willing to change the policies of its government by publicly voicing its displeasure, even going to the extent of changing it's elected officials or even its form of government, if need be, then they agree with the way their country is being represented and perceived; more importantly, the way they are represented and perceived. They publicly reaffirm this perception every time they wave 'Old Glory' around. That flag and the symbols on it represent both the government as well as the people.

ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVE

Now, as Muslims, why should we be so concerned about all this? Well, for one thing we should never want to look to any person, nation, government or anything as a source of guidance or direction over Allah. To do so would be shirk. No one is worthy of that honour except Allah, the Almighty.

So many people all over the world put so much trust in the US for finding the solutions to their problems. The US itself brags about how it is 'the greatest nation on the face of the earth.' People in other parts of the world think it is such a great honour to be allies or associated in some way with the United States of America. There was a time when these people, especially third world countries, thought that the streets in the US were paved with gold. Anything that they can possess that is American brings a sort of prestige. I remember, a few years ago, having a visitor from Egypt. I asked if there was anything I could get for him to take back to Egypt while he was here. He decided on running shoes and a jogging suit but insisted that they be Nike's. The reason, he said, is because he would be the envy of his entire town. Anything with a designer label from the US was highly sought.

What is really sad when we see so many brothers looking to the United States as the source for relieving their afflictions. Especially where people are oppressed or seeking justice and especially, when those people are sincere Muslims. Nothing or no one take the place of Allah as our Protector; no flag, no government, no nation, not even the believers themselves.

The Qur'an says:

"Do the unbelievers think that they can take my servants as protectors besides me? Verily we have prepared hell for the unbelievers for their entertainment."

Quran Al-Kahf 18:102:

There are some enemies of Allah that feel that although they practice evil deeds, perhaps if they mingle with the true believers, they will protect them against calamity. Allah assures them that their place is in the hell fire. The Qur'an teaches us in Ash-Shura 42:9-l0 that:

"It is God alone who has power over all things and that in Him we should trust."

So, coming back to our original subject, what does all this have to do with the symbol of the 'star and the crescent'? Well, for one thing, both symbols, the star and the crescent, come from the false worship or adoration for someone other than Allah. In the case of the crescent, it was the goddess Diana and with the star it was Mary, the mother of Jesus (peace be upon him). As much as we love and respect Mary, the mother of Jesus, peace and blessings be on her, she is not worthy of worship and she would be the first to tell you so. For that matter neither is Musa (Moses) or 'Isa (Jesus) or even our beloved Prophet, Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon them). Nor is the Qur'an worthy of worship or the entire record of ahadith or the two Holy Mosques or the Four Rightly Guided Caliphs (may Allah be pleased with them) or anything in this universe, past, present or future. Only Allah stands alone as worthy of worship. Yet some of us carry these symbols around as an expression of identity with those very beings and are proud to associate ourselves as Muslims by them.

Some may think that this is making a mountain out of a molehill and that it's silly to think that the use of these symbols could jeopardize our relationship with Allah; but I think it deserves a lot of prayer and deep meditation and thinking about this. Do we really want to take a chance of offending Allah and facing Him on the Day of Judgement with this on our record? Is associating ourselves with these symbols or icons really worth it? We must strive to 'always be true to Allah,' says the Qur'an, Al-Hajj 22: 31 'and never assigning partners to Him'.

Let us use our ability to reason and ask ourselves, is it really necessary to have an insignia or symbol to make the statement that we are Muslims? If one can so easily identify oneself as a Muslim by simply carrying the symbol of 'the star and crescent' around, then what's to say that the enemies of Islam can't do the same, as some of them have? I remember, my first Ramadan, one brother proudly revealed his chest to show 'the star and crescent' tattooed above the area of the heart. Wouldn't it be better and certainly more reliable, to identify ourselves as Muslims by our Islamic personality; demonstrating by our righteous deeds that we are of 'those that bow to Allah in Islam' (Qur'an, Al-Baqarah 2:136)?

There are many nations and religious organisations today that identity themselves as being Muslims by the use of these two symbols, 'the star and crescent' and yet we can see by their deeds that they are totally un-Islamic. How easily they live among us, corrupting the word of God and causing divisions among us and all they have to do to prove they are Muslims is flash the sign of the star and the crescent.

On the other hand, there are organisations like the Red Crescent that do so much good work for their fellow mankind. Also there is a big difference between the symbol of the 'star and crescent' and the hilal.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, let me state that all acts are acts of worship. We all try to do the best that we can according to the extent of our knowledge and our level of Iman. Everyone has a conscience. How sensitive our conscience is toward what we have discussed depends on what we previously stated, the extent of our knowledge and the level of our Iman.

It is not the responsibility of Muslims to point the finger at each other and try to force anyone to his personal understanding of matters. Religion and especially the interpretation of matters pertaining to religion should never be forced on anyone. We all know that the Qur'an states:

"...there is no compulsion in religion..."

(Qur'an, Al-Baqarah 1:190)

We know that there is nothing wrong with respecting the flag of any country. The degree to which one cares to show such respect is an individual matter of conscience. No one has the right to impose his conscience on another. But, it is important to know how some people feel about a flag, symbol or insignia. As to the use of the 'star and crescent' symbols, we know that Allah will judge all of us according to our niyah, our intentions, and how we choose to interpret all matters pertaining to Tawheed.

Proper attention should be given, however, to the use of a symbol or icon that at one time represented the worship of a goddess or to one that symbolises our 'godly' adoration for a righteous person whom some may place on the same plane of reverence reserved only for Allah. May Allah guide us as we search to perfect our worship of Him as He has perfected our religion. In the end we all return to Him and He will teach us what was best; for He is the best to decide as mentioned in the Qur'an, Yunus 10:108-109.

Incidentally, the 'Golden Age of Islam' that we all reminisce so passionately about came to a close about the mid-l5th century with the fall of Spain and the invasion of the Mongols. This was about the same time that 'the star and crescent' started to be hoisted up as the banner or representation of Muslims. We've never been able to regain that greatness again. Coincidence?

Posted by ummammaar 12:33 | Innovations, misconceptions,etc. | Comments Off | Permalink

History and detail about the XTIAN tradition of wedding rings

29 November, 2008

Posted by ummammaar 12:02 | Innovations, misconceptions,etc. | Comments Off | Permalink

• Regional Dialects
• نشيد لتعليم الحروف الهجائية
• You CAN Buy a House Riba-Free--With No Islamic Bank!
• What is the best way to solve marital problems?
• There is no explicit text to make it impermissable for one to recite Quran during hayd (menses)!

• August 2009
• April 2009
• February 2009
• January 2009
• November 2008
• December 2005

• Madinah Arabic books (audio files)
• Simply Arabic Online

• Islamic poem
• Muslim Youth Hotline (uk)
• Muslim youth hotline (US and Can.)
• Pictures of very old masahif
• Abu Sabaya (May Allah Make clear his innocence and Hasten his release, aameen.)
• explanation of the 40 ahadith an-nawawiyyah
• Investigating Islam (Answer my tricky questions!)
• Hear Islam
• Islam Yesterday
• Islam Tomorrow
• Islam Always
• Islam House
• Islam Way
• Islam Web
• Islam QA

• Tafsir by Hafidh Ibn Kathir (rh)

• Tafsir ibn Kathir in urdu (all 30 ajza)

• Quran [10]
• Sunnah [3]
• Fiqh [6]
• Arabi [5]
• General [15]
• Anasheed [0]
• News for the ummah [2]
• Homemaking [3]
• Innovations, misconceptions,etc. [3]
• Languages [1]
• Reminder [15]
• Parenting [2]
• Knowledge [1]
• Aqeedah [2]
• For non-Muslims [5]

• RSS 2.0
• Atom 0.3