My Views on News

Islamic World’s Attitudes on US Strongly Negative

munaeem | 06 May, 2007 19:10

Author:  John Burgess

US Public Diplomacy: A long row to hoe in the Islamic World

Worldpublicopinion.org a project of the Program on International Policy Attitudes at the University of Maryland, has recently published an public opinion poll on attitudes toward the US, terrorist organization, and a generalized ‘clash of civilizations’. [The link is to a 28-page PDF document. The questionnaire is also available as a 20-page PDF] The polling was conducted in Egypt, Indonesia, Morocco, and Pakistan between December 2006 and February 2007.

The results are pretty depressing. Majorities have negative views of the US government. Gross majorities believe it is US policy to undermine and divide the Islamic world and to spread Christianity. Majorities have a negative view of Western culture and believe that groups like Al-Qaeda are right in trying to fight its spread.

Majorities believe that the US is actively working to help Israel extend its territory and large numbers believe that the US is not really interested in a two-state solution to the Arab-Israeli problem.

Surprisingly large numbers believe that the true identities of the 9/11 attackers remain unknown with many believing, still, that either the US or Israel is behind the attacks. In none of the four countries is Al-Qaeda identified as being responsible by more than 35% of the polled population.

Majorities share the Al-Qaeda belief that Muslim countries should be ruled by strict Sharia law and that Islamic countries should be unified in a single Islamic state or Caliphate.

There are a few bright notes, though. Majorities in all countries believe that democracy is an appropriate form of government for their own country. Majorities also believe that globalization is good for them, though they object strongly to Western cultural values flooding their own societies.

Majorities in all countries are strongly opposed to attacks on civilian targets in America, Europe, or in Muslim countries. Al-Qaeda’s support among the polled populations is weak; Usama Bin Laden’s support level is even weaker, with maximum support (40%) coming from Egypt.

It’s hard to find much to cheer about here. What’s very clear is that the US has an enormous task ahead if it is to improve is image in the Islamic world. There are, though, some indications that this is possible.

The paradoxical attitudes about American freedoms (good) and American culture (bad) suggest that there is room for discussion here. It doesn’t make it any easier that large segments of American society don’t have clear ideas about what needs to be done in the Islamic world, or even about the Islamic world. It certainly doesn’t help, either, when there is no consensus in the US on the role of America in the world or on American values. With disturbingly large numbers of Americans believing that there’s something ‘fishy’ about 9/11, it’s hard to argue that foreign audiences are simply off the wall.

Attitudes don’t change as the result of a press release or a speech. They change only as the result of sustained behavior and a free flow of information, providing context when possible. This is not going to be an easy task, particularly when groups like the ‘net roots’, anarchical organizations, and purely crazy people muddy the public discourse. I do fear that ‘Bush Derangement Syndrome’ has become a global pandemic, but things will not change substantively following the next election.

The US needs to be fully engaged in explaining itself calmly and clearly, admitting when its policies apply differentially. The government can do more to repudiate those who demonize Islam. People—including Islamic audiences—realize that the world is not a tidy place, that one solution doesn’t fit all problems. Consistency, while desirable, is not always achievable, but this is not a new insight. We do need to explain why and how our policies are formed and applied, and what our goals are exactly. The messages explaining these have to be tailored to the audiences, but cannot be different or contradictory, one to the next.

A large part of the problem of attitudes is that foreign audiences, even in highly educated places like Europe, do not have a clear conception of how the US government works, the role of policy advocates and opponents, the role of Congress or the media. One cannot blame the local education systems. After all, what do the average American know about the political system of any other country. We can encourage the development of ‘American Studies’ programs in foreign universities, but we cannot make them happen nor can we ensure that students leave those programs with the ‘right’ ideas.

We cannot and should not seek to control what images and ideas about America are conveyed through our media. We can, though, make use of USG media to try to provide the context of our culture. While Paris Hilton may exemplify the worst we have to offer, her jailing can exemplify the best by demonstrating that rule of law does actually work.

View Original Article



email article
Tags:  World

Israel's Olmert won't fire rebellious minister

munaeem | 06 May, 2007 19:08

Adam Entous reports :

"Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert opted on Sunday against firing his deputy, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni, saying they would continue to work together despite her call for his resignation.

Livni issued a public call last week for Olmert to step down following the release of an official report sharply criticising his handling of last year's war in Lebanon."

Analysts say that this reprieve is temporary. The cause of this rapprochment is that government's main coalition partner, the left-leaning Labour party, is considering bolting, a move that could trigger snap elections.
email article
Tags:  In My Opinion,israel

Bahrain: Incense-wafting Journalism

munaeem | 06 May, 2007 19:06

Author:  Ayesha Saldanha

This week in Bahrain bloggers have been preoccupied with topics including sycophancy, the welfare of foreign labourers, and the culture of alcohol consumption. But let’s start with Tooners, who describes in detail an argument she had with her sister-in-law about child care, which resulted in her telling her sister-in-law exactly what she thought of her:

I have not been able to stand this wannabe princess/demonic thing since the very beginning but have held my tongue for the sake of the family and for my husband, but since he was fine w/ my telling her what I thought…. well…. I can’t tell you the weight it took off of my shoulders.

And she has decided to take refuge in her nationality:

This argument has done a couple of really good things. One, I don’t have to pretend to like the demonic thing any more and two, everyone knows now that I’m not playing around any more, and I guess they can look at me as the rude American… because now… I will say what I think. So be it….. I guess I’m rude and an American… Lord help us.

National and cultural stereotypes don’t always help, though; Bint Battuta, a non-Muslim, is having a hard time persuading her Bahraini friends that she doesn’t drink:

what I find strange is that the few Bahraini friends I have who do drink are almost evangelical about trying to persuade others to do so. … I just don’t recall being lectured about not drinking in Europe; sometimes friends will push a little, because they want you to ‘loosen up’ in the way they do, but I’ve never faced people arguing for drinking in the way I have here. The arguments people make have revolved around alcohol’s ability to let you fully experience life, to really harness your creativity, to make you write well, to really connect to your inner thoughts, even to release the child within… (Bear in mind that I have been given these little lectures by people who are artistic or creative in various ways.) I have even been told that one cannot really be a writer without drinking.

Maybe Abu Nuwas would have agreed; Cradle of Humanity reminds us that alcohol was once celebrated in Arab poetry:

Never had I read anything that referred to alcohol with such passion. The amount of love described surpasses that in a lot of orthodox love poetry. Abu Nawas is indeed a unique and an interesting historical character to investigate. Indulgence in alcohol, homosexuality and fornication are his main poetry subjects, with verses that do not shy away from explicitness. … Abu Nawas has earned himself a prestigious seat in “Mujun Poets”, or indecent poets.

Mujun poets were the rebels of their time, against social and Islamic norms they called for indulgence in pleasures- in public- with no shame. Given the amount of obscenity Mujun literature can be considered pornography.

It is inconceivable how a society which was tolerance enough to allow pornography to develop into a literature and poetry genre, can be in its state today. Blasphemy was inseparable to it, shocking the society into tolerance. Some Sukhf (ridicule) literature was the South Park of its time, rich in parody and satire.

Lulu writes about another Arab tradition, that of wafting incense around a leader, which she feels has taken on another form:

The Arabic term translates roughly into: holder of the mubkhar (incense burner). Traditionally, this would be the semi-servant person who hangs around the heads of the tribe, burning Oud and incense for them and telling them how great and amazing they are, they who do no wrong!

Nowdays, with the advances of nano-technology and all, the incense burner took a new form: words! Yes! Somehow, centuries later, we ended up with this semi-servant mentality in our press, parliament, and even business community. … It’s more than sad and annoying! It seems that a good portion of our journalists and public figures are treating the political system in Bahrain as if it was a big continuous PR party!

Mahmood is not impressed with another aspect of Bahraini society today. He starts by wishing us ‘Happy May Day’:

But only to the Bahraini workers.

Those who are in the private sector to be exact.

Let’s forget those in the public sector, as they are not allowed to form trade unions, they’re unimportant and can’t be counted.

Let’s also forget the Asian workers: Indians, Pakistanis, Bengalis, Filipinos and others who we simply don’t want to see, especially amongst our neighbourhoods, regardless of the fact that it is them and their ancestors who built all of our countries in the Gulf and continue to do so. Let us forget that it is them who keep our streets clean, who man and manage our transport systems, transfer of goods, build our houses and palaces, and manage a large sector of our commerce.

Of course Asian workers helped construct Bahrain’s Formula 1 circuit, which Mohammed AlMaskati reports is shortly to be put to another use:

You know it’s Bahrain…when a World Open Beach Volleyball Tournament is being held in a concrete jungle…

Bahrainis certainly like watching sports, but it seems they are not too keen on exercising themselves; they apparently some of the slowest walkers in the world. Babbling Bahrania
takes issue with how the findings of a report that has just come out have been interpreted:

Local press decided that our rather ‘unrushed’ walking speed is actually a virtue of our lifestyle, compared to the fast-paced living of urban-dwellers in other countries facing ‘all kinds of diseases’. Do the people who constructed this index not understand the cultural differences between these countries? Living in Bahrain, one fails to see the point of walking at all. The lack of pavements testifies either to lack of demand for walking or the cause of a walking-deficient nation. It seems our legs have been created to perform essential manoeuvring duties rather than general transportation.

Whether you’ll be rushing non-stop, or taking a leisurely stroll through the following days, I’ll see you back here next week for more news from Bahrain!

View Original Article



email article
Tags:  World

Protest Against CAIR Commissioner in New York

munaeem | 06 May, 2007 19:04

CBS-Obama-Racism2

Via CBSNews.com :

Today CBSNews.com informed its staff via email that they should no longer enable comments on stories about presidential candidate Barack Obama. The reason for the new policy, according to the email, is that stories about Obama have been attracting too many racist comments.

"It's very simple," Mike Sims, director of News and Operations for CBSNews.com, told me. "We have our Rules of Engagement. They prohibit personal attacks, especially racist attacks. Stories about Obama have been problematic, and we won't tolerate it."

CBSNews.com does sometimes delete comments on an individual basis, but Sims said that was not sufficient in the case of Obama stories due to "the volume and the persistence" of the objectionable comments. Read more…

This might explain why Obama requested Secret Service protection this early in the campaign. Sadly, this is what you get when racists and bigots are given credibilityairtime on a national platform who are joined by racist politicianspolitical party. While we're on the subject, I'd like to thank the C&L site monitor team for all of their hard work and unlimited backed by a well funded

View Original Article


email article
Tags:  US

Saudi Arabia: Milyani’s blog has been blocked

munaeem | 06 May, 2007 19:00

Author:  Sami Ben Gharbia

 

There’s a thrilling debate on the Saudi blogsphere after the news of blocking Mohammed Milyani’s blog by the Internet Services Unit (ISU). And even if there is a strong speculation that the block is due to a technical issue, since it is only targeting few pages and not the whole blog, Saudi bloggers are expressing their solidarity with Milyani and hoping that the block will be lifted soon.

View Original Article

email article
Tags:  World

 

 
A service provided by Al Bawaba