My Views on News

Israel’s Archaeological Crimes

munaeem | 25 February, 2007 17:16

Residents of the old city of Jerusalem know that Israel's recent declaration to suspend construction work on the steel bridge is intended to silence enraged Muslims. The ongoing excavations beneath the Noble Sanctuary [Al Haram al Qudsi al Sharif] in Jerusalem on several sites are even more catastrophic. Although some Israeli archeologists have recently announced that they discovered artifacts in the area, some of the archaeologists stated that work would continue for at least three years to complete the collection of the relics from this "holy" chapter. The statements made by Israeli authorities this time confirm that the project will continue. So what is Israel doing beneath and around al Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem and for what purpose? Digging and destruction started forty years ago and today's clamor is the straw that may break the camel's back as excavations are taking place wherever one turns. Also, the holy shrine is in need of its supporters with some of its foundations having been razed.

On the third day of the Six Day War in 1967, General Mordechai Gur arrived at the area of the Noble Sanctuary. He was on top of the world as he saw Israel's so-called Temple Mount finally falling into Israel's hands. What happened to Gur may be of interest to researchers of political affairs but the fall of the eastern part of Jerusalem, which had always inspired the imaginations of Jewish politicians, archeologists and clerics, paved the way for such imagination to be tested on the ground.

After Gur managed to reach the al Aqsa mosque, General Moshe Dayan and Ben-Gurion arrived at the Moroccan Quarter [Harat al Magharbah], and specifically at the Western Wall of al Aqsa mosque, which Muslims call al Buraq and Jews dub the Wailing Wall. Overexcited, Ben-Gurion removed an Arabic engraved plaque that provided information on the history of the site and Dayan confiscated the key to the Mugrabi Gate, the western gate of al Aqsa mosque. Israel is yet to return the key.

The two men questioned what could be done with the populated Moroccan Quarter that had existed for over one thousand years with its mosques, Zawiyas, shrines, monuments and shops. The answer soon came and was put into effect at midnight on June 10 when bulldozers moved in to knock down the Moroccan Quarter even with some of its residents still inside their homes, refusing to evacuate their residences after having received a three-hour notice. The result was the eviction of approximately 700 Palestinians from the Moroccan Quarter and three thousand Palestinians from the neighboring al Sharaf Quarter, which came to be called the Jewish Quarter. Some of the most important Ayyubid and Mamluk antiquities and distinguished Moorish heritage were reduced to rubble, including al Madrasa al Afdalia and al Buraq Mosque.

According to researcher Tahir al Namri, the Moroccan Quarter extended to over 16,000 square meters and comprised of 136 houses, four mosques, a modern school and Zawiyas, the most famous of which is the Bou Medyan Zawiya.

The world did not react to this archeological and humanitarian massacre. The Israelis dealt with the matter arrogantly to the extent that the hero of the demolition process, Etan Ben Moshe, who was a senior officer with the occupying army's Engineering Corps at the time, and who was later promoted to be its commander, gave a statement to the Israeli newspaper Yorshalim on 26 November 1999 in which he acknowledged that he killed a number of Palestinian residents of the Moroccan Quarter who were buried under the rubble, that is, beneath the present-day Wailing Wall where Jews worship. He stated that he took the bodies of three residents to the Israeli Bikur Cholim Hospital.

It should be highlighted that many Israeli archeologists refused to accept the results of excavations that were conducted by foreign missions in Jerusalem before occupation, as they failed to unearth what the Israelis hoped for. The dreams of glory for Israeli archeologists remained as such a discovery would confirm the words of the Torah. Their dreams converged with the designs of the Hebrew state for the largest illegal excavation process to begin without supervision after Israel had revoked licenses from and expelled the foreign excavators who had worked under Jordanian administration. It is difficult to trace the excavations, demolition, destruction and construction that took place in Jerusalem over 40 years ago, and even the Palestinians do not know what happened and what continues to take place.

Excavations triggered heated reactions from the Palestinians in the form of demonstrations, uprisings and armed activity. This was not paralleled by any professional scholarly effort that can present a Palestinian, Arab or even an independent account of what is taking place, which can be dubbed the archeological crime of our time.

Archaeologist Eilat Mazar appeared on the scene. She is the granddaughter of Benjamin Mazar, the former president of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem who failed to realize any of his dreams regarding the excavations in which he participated around and beneath the Noble Sanctuary.

In 2006, Mazar published a book in which she clearly stated that she sought to dig nine meters below the Mugrabi Gate to Ain Salwan to unearth Barclay's Gate—that "if actually discovered, would be the world's largest monument," according to her.

But Mazar took it further than that and used the image of the “hypothetical” gate as the front cover of her book – and it became the starting point of her work. More accurately, one could say that the work never ended for it to begin and it is not limited to the Mugrabi Gate but also includes most of the Old City of Jerusalem.

What is certain is that Mazar and her colleagues have worked over the past four months in the Salwan area and have unearthed the tunnel that will lead them to the supposed Barclay's Gate, however, this was only announced earlier this year.

To understand what has been happening recently, we should look at a number of key events. On August 13, 2006, the Jerusalem municipality published an invitation in a number of newspapers to demolish the Mugrabi Gate. The declared purpose was to rebuild the bridge that collapsed following an earthquake in February 2004. The Israeli bulldozers prepared for work on the Mugrabi Gate earlier this year, which coincided with the beginning of the construction of a synagogue on al Wad Road near one of the Al Haram al Qudsi al Sharif gates. While attention was directed to the construction of the synagogue, bulldozers seized the chance to demolish the rest of the Moroccan Quarter, razing Ayyubid and Mamluk houses with the aim of building the so-called Western Wall heritage center.

The archeological crime that has transpired can never be justified; however, in January 2007 the Israeli Antiquities Authority declared that it is responsible for the excavations carried out opposite The Noble Sanctuary and the Mugrabi Gate that leads to it. According to the authority, the significance of the excavations stems from the fact that there have never been excavations in that area before.

According to this authority, there have been discoveries of a section of an aqueduct that channeled water from Solomon’s Pools to the Noble Sanctuary [which the authority always refers to as Temple Mount]. Other discoveries include a colonnaded street, described by many as magnificent, from the Roman-Byzantine era.

 

Source : Asharq Al-Awsat-

Pakistan gathering not aimed at Shias or Iran: Erdogan

munaeem | 25 February, 2007 06:53

Via The Daily Times, Pakistan : Pakistan gathering not aimed at Shias or Iran

A string of meetings planned by President Gen Pervez Musharraf for leaders of key Muslim nations are not aimed at forging an alliance against Shiite Iran, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Saturday.

“This is not designed to isolate any country,” Erdogan told the Qatari-based Al-Jazeera television network. “It should not be taken from this (point of view),” he said in the interview recorded earlier Saturday in Istanbul, Turkey.

Pakistan is to host a meeting of foreign ministers from seven Muslim nations on Sunday (today) to discuss how to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and bring peace to Iraq and Afghanistan.


Media reports in the Arab world suggested that Musharraf aims to establish up a Sunni alliance to confront rising influence of Shiite Iran in the region.

The reports are true. But Iran is responsible for this. Since 1979, Iran has pursued  interventionist policies.

Vali Nasr, a Council for Foreign Relations fellow explains :“The first decade of Khomeini trying to mobilize Saudi Shiites, Lebanese Shiites and trying to stage a coup in Bahrain and cause trouble in Kuwait all hardened views.”

Khomeini threatened the countries around him. He threatened Iraq and he threatened Saudi Arabia and each responded in a wrong way. Iraq ended up attacking Iran.

The real cause of the tension according to Iranian author Amir Taheri, is that “Iran intends to reshape the Middle East after its own fashion” (New York Post, August 8).

Ahmadinejad stated clearly his vision for the future of the region in his election campaign: “The Middle East can have either an American future or an Islamic one led by Iran.”

This kind of rhetoric has frightened the Arabs rulers. They are of the opinion that Israel is the devil they know, but Iran is the growing threat.

Prevention of Palestinian Islamic Jihad suicide bombing attack in Tel Aviv

munaeem | 25 February, 2007 06:36

On February 20 a suicide bombing attack, which apparently was supposed to be carried out in Tel Aviv, was prevented. Information reached the Israeli security forces that a suicide bomber had left the village Jalboun (near Jenin in northern Samaria ) in the early morning hours on his way to the center of the country. He was carrying a backpack with a large quantity of explosives and intended to blow himself up in a crowded location (Central Bus Station or shopping mall). The suicide bomber and a number of other suspects were detained in an apartment in Bat Yam (a southern suburb of Tel Aviv).

Muhammad Ibrahim Qassem Ubeid, senior operative on the wanted list of Palestinian Islamic Jihad terrorists in Judea and Samaria, who dispatched the suicide bomber to Israel (from the PIJ Website, February 22).

The suicide bomber was Omar Abu Roub , 23, a resident of Jalboun. A preliminary interrogation revealed that he reached Rishon Letzion (south of Tel Aviv) in the early afternoon hours of February 20 carrying a backpack with an explosive device he claimed he would detonate, in Tel Aviv . For a reason which is still unclear, possibly a technical fault, he decided to throw the device into a Dumpster in Rishon Letzion. He then went to an apartment in Bat Yam where he knew he could hide and remained there until he was detained. He was then taken to the center of Rishon Letzion and showed the police the Dumpster where he threw the device.

In the Jenin refugee camp the following day the Israeli security forces killed Muhammad Ibrahim Qassem Ubeid (Abu Jahim) as he was riding in his car. He was armed with an M-16 and the IDF spokesman reported that a number of explosive devices were found in the vehicle. He was one of the most wanted operatives of the PIJ in northern Samaria and had dispatched the suicide bomber whose attack was prevented on February 20. He was responsible for the recruitment of potential suicide bombers, manufactured high-quality explosive devices and was involved in dozens of attacks using explosives against IDF forces in the Jenin area.

The PIJ, directed by its headquarters in Damascus and sponsored and supported by Iran and Syria , continues to be the organization responsible for the greatest number of suicide bombing attacks carried out in Israel . The last, carried out in collaboration with elements within Fatah, was at a bakery in the southern city of Eilat on January 29. As opposed to Fatah and Hamas, the PIJ does not regard itself as committed to restraining its activities in view of political considerations or taking into account the needs of the Palestinian population. Its policy of attacks originating in the Gaza Strip, Judea and Samaria, have continued to escalate and have led to the deterioration of the security situation, despite the ceasefire agreement in the Gaza Strip reached by Israel and Palestinian Authority chairman Abu Mazen.

‘OIC states to sever ties with Israel’

munaeem | 25 February, 2007 06:15

Via The Dawn, Pakistan : ‘OIC states to sever ties with Israel’

Malaysia, the chair of the 57-member Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC), said on Saturday the grouping had agreed to sever ties with Israel over its works at the Al Aqsa mosque, according to the state media.

It is unrealistic to expect that cutting diplomatic relations with Israel will solve the problem.

Israel has diplomatic relations with 12 countries out 57 OIC members. It is unlikely that those countries will sever relationship with Israel.

Instead of asking these countries to sever relationship with Israel. They should be requested to use their relationship to oversee the excavation work.

The State of Israel is a reality , which cannot be destroyed by curses and rhetoric.

Muslims countries should established diplomatic relationship Israel. This will help in solving the Arab-Israeli conflict.

If Arabs and Muslims can have diplomatic relationship with communist m Christian and Hindu states. Why can they not establish relationship with Israel ?
 
A service provided by Al Bawaba