It looks like we have another contender in the Latin American hottie (non)competition: Cuba's Aylin Mujica certainly has the credentials for a winning entry, particularly if she enters with her back to the judges. (dailypoa.com)
Dear Visitor(s)
Take into consideration - What if there was no "FREEDOM"?
Then you see this Blog and are reminded that you would be
missing out on so many important things...Enjoy your stay and recommend to your friends to come and taste the "FREEDOM" Geminimay
Read more of Slate's coverage of the Eliot Spitzer prostitution scandal. Emily Bazelon was online on March 13 to chat with readers about this article; read the transcript.
When he was attorney general, Eliot Spitzer had no trouble going after a "sophisticated prostitution ring." As governor, he apparently had no trouble patronizing one. The hypocrisy speaks for itself. But what about the oldest question about the oldest profession: Why, exactly, is prostitution illegal?
The case for making it against the law to buy sex begins with the premise that it's base and exploitative and demeaning to sex workers. Legalizing prostitution expands it, the argument goes, and also helps pimps, fails to protect women, and leads to more back-alley violence, not less. This fight over legalization has been waged in the last few years over international human-trafficking laws and proposals to make prostitution legal in countries like Bulgaria, a movement that the U.S. government helped defeat. In 2004, the federal government expressed its position: "The United States government takes a firm stance against proposals to legalize prostitution because prostitution directly contributes to the modern-day slave trade and is inherently demeaning." The government also claims that legalizing or tolerating prostitution creates "greater demand for human trafficking victims." And yet, prostitution is legal in parts of Nevada, a companion to other cherished vices.
You don't have to be a moralist or a prude to buy the argument for banning prostitution. But if you're so inclined, it's an easy one to take apart. Martha Nussbaum, a law and philosophy professor at the University of Chicago, argues that lots of work involves the sale of bodily services and that lots of the work that poor women do involves bad working conditions. For her, it's all about context—there's a big difference between a street worker controlled by a pimp and a high-end call girl who picks her own clients, and the real question is how to increase poor women's access to decent and safe work in general. Legalizing prostitution "is likely to make things a little better for women who have too few options to begin with," Nussbaum writes.
The extremely pricey outfit Spitzer apparently used looks like an example of the high-end trade Nussbaum would distinguish from low-rent street work. The further defense of such escort services is that prostitution is inevitable and that conditions will be better for everyone all around if it's regulated (more condoms, fewer beatings). This parallels the argument against Prohibition or in favor of drug legalization: Illegality puts the bad guys and their guns in control. Women who fear prosecution can't go to the police for help. Better to give women more recourse to head off abuse and even inspect brothels for health-code violations.
Would legalizing prostitution increase trafficking? Not necessarily. "By this logic, the state of Nevada should be awash in foreign sex slaves, leading one to wonder what steps the Justice Department is taking to free them," writer David Feingold noted dryly in Foreign Policy in 2005. Countries in which prostitution is legal—Australia, Germany, the Netherlands—aren't cesspools. On the other hand, they haven't seen the demand for prostitution drop off, either, and sometimes it rises.
That's a disappointment for advocates of legalization, and lately there's another favorite model. In 1999, Sweden made it legal to sell sex but illegal to buy it—only the johns and the traffickers can be prosecuted. This is the only approach to prostitution that's based on "sex equality," argues University of Michigan law professor Catharine MacKinnon. It treats prostitution as a social evil but views the women who do it as the victims of sexual exploitation who "should not be victimized again by the state by being made into criminals," as MacKinnon put it to me in an e-mail. It's the men who use the women, she continued, who are "sexual predators" and should be punished as such.
It looks like we have another contender in the Latin American hottie (non)competition: Cuba's Aylin Mujica certainly has the credentials for a winning entry, particularly if she enters with her back to the judges. (dailypoa.com)
In
an effort to quantify, qualify and classify all there is to know about
our sexual omniverse, our sexy friends at Guanabee have attempted to
help every one out there determine just how easy it is to get laid
depending on what country you call home. They've assigned all the major
countries of the Spanish-speaking world (and Brazil) a number known as
the "Country Fuckability Value" (CFV). We're not really sure how it's
calculated, because it's rooted in high-end mathematic theory and
therefore too complex for dummies like us the average blogger.
But we really like the idea behind it, even if what we really want to
know is how accurate it is. To test the system, we've chosen what we
think is the hottest babe from each of the countries in the chart and
lined them up to see how their national ratings translate to real-life
bangability. Granted, some of our choices might not coincide with your
own; after all, identifying hot Uruguayan pornstars is not our strong
suit, and sometimes we've had to resort to national descent instead of
actual citizenship. If you disagree with our choices or the rankings,
defend your nation's honor in the comments. That said, and without
further ado ... let the battle of the babes begin.
. . .
· Argentina: (CFV = 80)
Carolina "Pampita" Ardohain , model

· Bolivia: (CFV = 40)
Raquel Welch, actress (Bolivian father)

· Brazil: (CFV = 75)
Gisele Bundchen, supermodel

· Chile: (CFV = 60)
Leonor Varela, Cleopatra look-alike

· Colombia: (CFV = 60)
Shakira, hip shaker

· Costa Rica: (CFV = 60)
Candice Michelle, WWE Diva, Playboy model, URL salesgirl, foot worshipee (Costa Rican decent)

· Cuba: (CFV = 50)
Vida Guerra, ass technician

· Dominican Republic: (CFV = 40)
Judy Reyes, fake nurse

· Ecuador: (CFV = 35)
Christina Aguilera, MILF-in-training (father born in Ecuador)

· El Salvador: (CFV = 35)
Christy Turlington, supermodel (mother from El Salvador)

· Guatemala: (CFV = 20)
Daphne Zuniga , friend to animals? (Guatemalan father)

· Honduras: (CFV = 25)
America Ferrera, ugly person (Honduran parents, actually much hotter than this)

· Mexico: (CFV = 70)
Sativa Rose, star of "I've Been Sodomized"

· Nicaragua: (CFV = 50)
Barbara Carrera, Bond girl

· Panama: (CFV = 45)
Ester Cordet, Miss October 1974

· Paraguay:(CFV = 30)
Cindy Taylor, TV host

· Peru: (CFV = 40)
Marina Mora, Miss Peru 2001

· Puerto Rico: (CFV = 60)
Vanessa Del Rio, distinguished porn veteran

· Spain*: (CFV = 80)
Penelope Cruz, actress (nudeactress.net)

(*Ed. note: Yes, we know Spain isn't in Latin America -- but it was
in the original list we based this post on. We also just wanted to
include Penelope Cruz somehow.)
· Uruguay: (CFV = 45)
Natalia Oreiro, famous person (?)

· Venezuela: (CFV = 55)
Aida Yespica, hottie

- - -
· The International Fuckability Hierarchy Index: (guanabee.com)
Hello, that is the ugliest Mexican woman ever. You could have at least used Salma Hayek. Jessica Alba is half.
America Ferrera is pretty hot. I would hit that.
Penelope Cruz is not a latin american girl. She's Spaniard (remember Spain IS in EUROPE, not in Latin America)
@tonemgub: We know, but Spain was on the original list so we included it. As usual in these situations, we blame NAFTA.
As much as I LURVEEEE Vannessa, You could have picked Roselyn Sanchez to represent Puerto Rico.
What happen to Maria Sanchez, I mean Jasmine Byrne?
Anyway, they all pretty much blow the top off the fuckable meter!
Vanessa Del Rio(The Belladonna of her era)in her day was as hot they
came. Now fifty plus pounds heavier(and much older), she is still very
fuckable.
Adding Penelope was cool too. The chick looks like a big dish of ice
cream that makes you wanna lick the bowl over and over again.
Argentina FTW? This should bode well for Alexis Bledel, who was also born there.
.
No disrespect, but this is a pretty fucked up list. Definitely no proper justice done with this list. I'm sorry, what a joke.
I don't get how you compare a Classy Actress / Musician reppin' one
country, and some dirty cumface slut whore reppin' another, and then
comparing the two?
Expand mann.
@Coming Into The Game, ♪♪ ♪♪♪ #J23 - The Superstar Receiver,...: Well, I was going ask who you would add to the list, but then you had to go and call people names and that's when I remembered that I don't care what you think.
No disrespect, of course!
HI, I´m
from Peru, and Marina Mora is not the most beautiful and fuckable girl
here, she was Miss Peru some years ago, but now she´s fat !, really,
appears that some girls earn good money to start eating & eating
and eating..
she have a cute face, good ass, but now she´s fat !
Peruvian princess like Alexis Amore, why not ? she born in Peru.
And why not to check this page [www.chicasperu.com] fulled of amateur peruvian girls ?
@tonemgub: The name of the original article is The International Fuckability Hierarchy Index: Latin Countries. Spain is the original Latin country. If you don't understand how, read this.
@pipileptico: Thanks for the tip.
Honduras & Mexico leave a smile on my face, but Chile & Cuba have left me gasping. I am quite fond of Srta Varela, & I have warmed to Vida Guerra (even if she's prolly a Cuban-American monomaniac that would talk about deposing Castro even while she makes love).
Also, I will vounch for Coming into the game, the Superstar receiver for your Upper Deck Toronto BbbbbbJjjjjjs.... He's good people. Don't ban 'im.
@ yourfriendandneighbor: Uh, actually youre wrong, the original Latin country is Italy (roman empire), and if you don't know why then youre a retard. Your comment might have made some sense had you been talking about Hispanic countries, and even so I disagree.

I was not a porn consumer or seeker when I was a teenager. Though I was sexually precocious and promiscuous in many ways, porn wasn’t really on my radar. In fact, when a high school friend found me on MySpace recently and discovered that I’d become a porn director, he was pretty surprised. But since I’m a bit of an extremist, when I began to explore porn, I really did it up. And I wanted to find porn that was like me – bisexual.
At my first job in sex, I lucked into a treasure trove of porn with obsessively categorized videos, magazines, and mementos: the Ralph Wittington Collection at the Museum of Sex. I started as a researcher at the Museum and then became an assistant curator the year it opened – and in addition to jump-starting my career as a sex nerd, being exposed (ahem) to the wealth of smut in the Wittington collection plus meeting a delightful array of sex industry legends got me started on my own personal journey.
Among the carefully labeled boxes that contained videos in plastic archival boxes, polaroids of enthusiastic collector Ralph Wittington with a variety of stars, and a smattering of creepy flesh-colored sex toys was a box labeled “bisexual.” The contents were a bunch of Paul Norman films – the “Bi and Beyond” series that kicked off in 1988. The late 1980s through the mid-1990s were apparently the heyday for bisexual porn – if a heyday can be considered somewhat prolific production from one director.
I was a bit puzzled – this bisexual porn seemed to be kind of a crappy afterthought (even in it’s heyday). The main thing that distinguishes bi porn –then and today- from straight porn is the fact that men touch each other in it; porn with girl on girl action is essentially considered straight. And no one bats an eye if a female performer who does scenes with other women says she’s straight; but guys who do scenes with other guys are thought of as gay gay gay, whatever they call themselves.
In addition to the dude-on-dude action, the Paul Norman films often had “hermaphrodites” in them. In one of the films I saw, the so-called hermaphrodites were biological women wearing flesh-colored strap-ons with lots of concealer makeup so they kinda sorta looked like real penises. If you’re feeling generous, you might be inclined to think of these hermaphrodites as Havelock Ellis’ definition of bisexual - people with the genitals of both sexes. Or you might think that Norman either didn’t know MTF pre-op transsexuals exist or for some reason didn’t want to hire them. I don’t really know the answer to that quandary.
In Norman’s films, the performers generally give the impression that they are doing a job, and not one they entirely understand or think is sexy. To his credit, Norman’s films were a thing unto their own - bisexual porn. Since then, however, bisexual smut has been subsumed into gay porn, despite the presence of heterosexual and girl-girl (I hesitate to say lesbian) scenes. The porn industry seems to not at all believe that bisexuality exists, rather that for guys its a stumbling block on the way to full fledged gay, and that girls just want to get attention (and paying porn jobs) any way possible.
In porn, girls do each other with a male viewer in mind, and once a guy has done another guy rumors will fly about his sexuality for the rest of his career - often he uses a different name for gay and straight scenes. Many porn studios with contract girls don’t allow their girls to do scenes in bi movies or with men who’ve done gay scenes because of the associated stigma and the perceived risk of HIV infection. Sex educators and sex toy retailers know better and acknowledge a broader spectrum of sexuality, which is probably why one of the few bi movies of note in recent years, Slide Bi Me, was produced by the San Francisco-based Good Vibrations in 2001.
In 2006, when I got the opportunity to direct and produce my first porn film, I knew immediately that I wanted to make a film that did justice to actual bisexual experiences and identities (and I emphasize that both of those are plural). I aimed to make a film that captured some of the bi action I’d personally seen and participated in at private sex parties in my hometown New York City. I had a wild ride with The Bi Apple, which was released by Adam and Eve Pictures in February 2007. It all started with a big party in a strip club, which was followed by public screenings in Amsterdam, New York and Berlin (as well as plenty of -ahem- private screenings), an award for Hottest Bi Sex Scene at the Good For Her Feminist Porn Awards, a blurb in Oprah magazine, and a nomination for the GayVN Award for Best Bisexual Release. A lot of things about The Bi Apple don’t fit too well with the bi traditions - it has a female protagonist and a female director, and it features authentically bisexual performers, many of whom were amateurs.
A few people asked me if I felt weird about being given a nod by GayVN but being totally ignored by the AVN Awards, where niche award categories like “Best Internal Release” exist but bi porn is invisible. Honestly - no. I don’t really feel at home in either half of the porn industry - the halves are the problem for me. Sexuality isn’t black or white, there’s a lot of gray area - just have a look at the Kinsey scale and you’ll see that there are very few people who are perfectly gay or perfectly straight. When I first began to wade through the wealth of sexual media six years ago, I wouldn’t have believed that the sex industry could be so, well, conservative and narrow-minded about sexuality. But my experiences with seeking out and making bisexual smut have taught me that indeed, that is the case. Of course some of it is marketing – which I have great respect for. You can’t sell a product if you don’t have a specific name for it, and claiming to make anything goes pansexual porn would be met with silent dismissal from most distributors. But the way that most pornographers steer clear of bisexual activity is about more than marketing – it’s about homo- and biphobia, being afraid of fluidity, and maintaining an outdated, one-drop rule about gayness. In an industry where anal gaping, throat fucking, and group sex are part of normal, mainstream movies, it will always seem bizarre to me that bisexual interaction is the ick factor.
Audacia Ray
LiveGirlReview.com
WakingVixen.com

What words strike you as “bad” ones? Maybe that’s a kind of weird way to start off a column on a porn site, because, let’s face it – you’re here for the bad words. And pictures. Or at least, the ones that are so bad, they’re good. But what about words that give you that “bad touch” skin crawly feeling? Everyone’s got them. For me, the phrases that make me feel icky are a few genital descriptors: “meat curtains” for labia and “blue veiner” for penis. Just writing that makes me feel gross, but luckily on the average day I can avoid any mention of those phrases because they aren’t especially common.
Ian Denchasy, however, has a much harder time avoiding the turns of phrase that make him feel icky – because they describe the industry he works in. Along with his wife Alicia, Ian founded and runs Freddy and Eddy, an erotic boutique in the Venice Beach neighborhood of Los Angeles that began ten years ago as a website ploy to get free sex toys to review.
Today the business has blossomed into one of the most unique sex shops I’ve ever been into – Ian prepares cappuccino almost as soon as visitors arrive, while Alicia gives a personalized tour of their space. First timers can expect to spend an hour or more perusing, chatting and learning, and though they might leave with a new product, they’re just as likely to borrow a book or movie from the lending library the couple maintains.
And those icky words that make Ian shudder? “Porn,” “adult,” and “novelty.” During a gathering at the Adult Entertainment Expo last month, I had an impassioned conversation with Ian about those words, and the fact that they make him feel gross about his sexuality and his desire to seek out erotic entertainment that will respect him in the morning. Although over the last twenty years we’ve seen the rapid growth of the women’s and couple’s markets (hence sites like this one), words like these persist, and they don’t do us any favors.
After one too many years of being put through the paces of adult conventions and feeling assaulted by ickiness, Ian and Alicia took the initiative to pioneer a new kind of sexuality event, Love LA.
The one day event took place on Sunday, January 27th in rainy Los Angeles largely due to the passion of Ian and Alicia and the sponsorship of the LA Weekly and Xbiz. Although from a distance it looked like a typical adult trade show, the organizers made sure it was anything but. For one thing, they decided early on that there would be no porn. That’s right: no 18-year-old girls in lucite heels, no balloon-breasted women signing 8×10s for a long line of admirers. No porn.
Where the porn would be in other shows like it, Love LA had welcoming booths in which independent sex toy companies had their wares on display and did a lot of meeting and greeting. They also offered up seminars throughout the day that ranged from bondage basics to tips on role play to lighthearted crafty fun like making explicit shrinky dinks. The whole event was billed as “the first ever Sexual Health, Education and Entertainment Exhibition,” and it seems to have lived up to the hype.
Olivia Hayes, who commandeers the Pleasure Happens blog for sex toy retailer the Pleasure Chest, was impressed with the swankiness of the event. “I think there was a strong commitment made to distance this event from the ‘trashiness’ people generally associate with sex toys and the like,” she says, “and I think [calling the event] ‘upscale’ would be about on par.” The event was full of retailers, with female owned and run companies having a major presence, and small, independent businesses overrunning the floor.
The mainstream adult industry is unfortunately characterized by faceless corporations or male leadership that would make anyone want to hide behind the anonymity of the typical adult transaction, but the small companies represented at Love LA take a different approach entirely.
Olivia reports that, “I felt like this event was really more about networking, brand awareness, and education… I wouldn’t say there were a ton of actual products sold. A lot of swag was given away and much networking was done, and I think that was more the point than to sell stuff, which I feel is more often the motivation behind other trade shows.”
The absence of porn seems to have affected the demographic of the attendees – Ian says that of the 1000 people who bought tickets, about 65% were female, and about half of those brought their partners with them. Olivia confirms this and says that, “There were lots of young couples, queer female couples (of all gender expressions…not just the lipstick lesbians that LA is known for), older couples that seemed a little shy, single people milling about…The only demographic I didn’t really get the sense that this event attracted were gay men.”
The questions Love LA asked were: can so-called “adult” businesses attract attention and enthusiasm if porn stars are cut out of the picture? Will consumers still know what they’re looking at without those words that make Ian go “ew”?
Overwhelmingly, the event answered both of these questions with a big yes. People who want to get sexy aren’t stupid, they don’t need to be talked down to or always have their basest desires appealed to.
But for this avowed pornographer and shameless smut watcher, eliminating the porn isn’t the best and only answer. Certainly it made planning easier, but hopefully with a little education and the positive example of the non-porn part of the biz, pornographers with their heads and hearts in the right place will be welcome in the future. The foundation is laid, and the potential is proven – it is possible to make sexy entertainment fun and welcoming without losing the mojo.
Click here to check out pictures from Love LA!
Audacia Ray
LiveGirlReview.com
WakingVixen.com
Check out her directorial debut, The Bi Apple!

The idea of pornographers with ethics and strong political convictions seems ridiculous to many people. After all, isn’t porn just about overly-tanned hedonism, driven by the desire to make a mint while surrounded by swarms of hot chicks who wouldn’t otherwise give you (assuming the portly, fiftyish male “you”) the time of day? Not so fast, assumption-maker.
“I think a lot of folks are surprised that what I produce even exists,” says FurryGirl, “especially lefty/liberal sorts of people who have a condescending attitude towards the sex industry and people who work within it.” Furry Girl, so named for her commitment to her body hair, has been in the adult industry for five years. She quickly became a photographer and webmistress after she started modeling - and did the math. She cut out the content creator and manager middlemen and took control of production and marketing herself, and has reaped the benefits ever since. In addition to her eponymous site, Furry Girl runs a porn site featuring vegan and vegetarian models, VegPorn; a menstruation porn site, EroticRed; and the Sensual Vegan, an all-vegan sexuality products online shop. Beyond the fact that Furry Girl benefits better financially from cutting out the middleman-her sites are her sole source of income-she can market herself without the trappings of porno protocol. What emerges from her sites is the sense of Furry Girl as friendly, personable, and delightfully naughty, without a hint of the dirty shame that seems to permeate a lot of other sites.
Amateur and independent porn began getting buzz with the advent of the home video camera and the newly glorious ability it bestowed on the average electronics geek to film his or her pasty white ass bobbing up and down in a poorly lit guest bedroom in New Jersey (not to stereotype or anything). But it really took off in the early 2000s as the Internet began to emerge as the go-to place for sex businesses, especially homemade ones. More specifically, young, technologically inclined idealists began to turn to the Internet to create their visions of sex-positive culture online.
When the oft-cited Suicide Girls was launched in 2001, it positioned itself as a site of female-empowerment via Internet nudity. In subsequent years, this turned out to be a bit more complicated and maybe not really the way things were running behind the scenes. Still, there are independent pornographers whose hope for the empowering mojo of independent porn springs eternal. The Sharing is Sexy (SiS) collective is one such group - their freshly hatched and totally free website launched just last week. Unlike Furry Girl, the SiS folks have no intention of making a living from their work on the site. In fact, as collective member lotu5 puts it, “SiS came out of anti-capitalist activism. …all our content is free, we try to spend as little as possible, dumpster what we can, leech resources from universities and jobs and make everything free.” At the same time, lotu5 says that, “One of our primary goals is to not discredit sex workers and ‘for pay’ porn sites.”
Although I do raise my fist in solidarity with queer, feminist, indie pornographers like the SiS collective, it’s difficult for me to wrap my head around the idea of detaching images of people getting sexy from the money-making industry around it. Part of this, no doubt, is the fact that I’ve made my living in and around the adult industry for the past six years. My impulse is not “it’s a dirty business but someone’s got to do it,” but rather that if you’re going to put yourself out there in a very intense, life-altering way, you should be financially rewarded for it as handsomely as possible.
This isn’t to say that porn performers and producers should be doing laps in platinum-lined swimming pools, hungry people of the world be damned. In fact, there are a number of porn businesses that funnel some of their porn money into other sex-positive causes. Furry Girl donates 5% of earnings from her adventures in porn to the independently financed Scarleteen, a sexuality resource for teenagers. Madison Young, an adult performer and owner of the San Francisco art gallery Femina Potens, has also used her porn money to fund her work with the gallery, which shows art by women and transgendered artists. Madison also has a website, Anal4Art, in the works. “Anal4Art will feature hot queer and straight artists getting it up the ass in hot settings like rock venues, artist studios, art class, etc.,” says Young. The earnings from the site will benefit Femina Potens.
But what kind of cultural currency does a free porn site hold? For the visitors the answer is painfully obvious: unmitigated access to free porn (duh). But for producers and performers, things are a little more complex. The collective members of Sharing is Sexy clearly see their disregard for the finances of the porn biz as an act of resistance. “I came to SiS with the remembrance that the realization of my desires has healed my cunt from shame and abuse,” asserts collective member j, “and from this sexual liberation I am ready to share my desires.” For the collective, SiS is about sharing, and constructive exchanges around sexuality. This doesn’t make the site a higher form of porn than that produced by Furry Girl, Madison Young, or the hordes of producers churning out a new DVD every week. Instead, it’s a different form of sexual communicating. If the power of porn is handled well by people who over think (ahem), then maybe the way sites handle their money isn’t the biggest issue of them all, as long as everyone’s free to do as they please with their resources (whether those resources are flesh or cash).
Audacia Ray
LiveGirlReview.com
WakingVixen.com
Check out her directorial debut, The Bi Apple!

If there’s one unifying force that brings together female porn makers
on either side of the Atlantic, it is a commitment to thinking through
the process of making porn before diving in headlong. Maybe that seems
kind of dull - why spend all this time thinking when you could be
coaxing local hotties into stripping down and showing their stuff in
casting sessions? - but the proof is in the pudding. Erika Lust runs
her ever-growing Lust Films out of Barcelona, while Julia Ostertag’s
independent filmmaking projects are based out of Berlin - both women
work against the grain to create unique films that showcase male and
female eroticism in a carefully considered way.
Though neither director shies away from the hardcore nature of porn, both of them reject the absurdity of the beauty standards and simplified sexuality presented by mainstream culture and pornos that are typically aimed at a male audience. Lust observes that, “One of the most repeated clichés is the fact that male porn directors like to portay slutty lolitas, horny teens, sex maniac nannies, desperate milfs, hot nurses, nymphomaniacs hookers, and gangbang heroines - these women are THEIR ideal sex partners. And the guys in the movies are almost always mafia guys, pimps, dealers, multimillionaires, afroamerican mega sized sex machines - (these are the THEIR sex heroes.” Instead of these overblown, eye-roll inducing stereotypes, Lust prefers to watch normal looking people having sex they enjoy under circumstances that most viewers can identify with. Ostertag concurs and takes this one step further, saying, “There definitely should be more real cool strong hot women in front of the camera that I as an ‘intelligent hot girl’ can identify with.”
Lust and Ostertag both forgo casting agencies to find performers for their movies - it’s a much more involved and personal process than that. Lust searches for talent who are good looking but don’t look like porn stars throughout Spain and also in the Balearic and Canary Islands. Ostertag doesn’t do casting sessions at all, choosing instead to trust her intuition. “I watch people and try to find out if they would also work in front of a camera,” she says, “So I talk to them to find out if the chemistry is right and arrange a test shooting. Berlin is a good place to work that way as there are a lot of people around who are curious and open.”
Although the two directors have a common vision and share a critique of the way most porn is made, the execution of their concepts is very different and very much linked with their personal tastes. Lust directs her films for a female audience and tries to appeal to feminine - and feminist - sensibilities. Her short film “The Good Girl,” which has now become a part of her most recent feature-length movie, “Five Hot Stories for Her” (http://www.cincohistorias.com - only in Spanish at the moment), has a tongue in cheek approach to the typical porn set-up -there’s a hot pizza delivery guy- but a heavy focus on the woman’s fantasy and pleasure. The man in the film is very much a prop, but not in the ugly-man-with- only-his-cock-in-the-frame way that is prevalent in so much mainstream porn. The characters interact with a lot of playfulness, and the film is shot to give the viewer visual pleasure in looking at the sex as well as the filmmaking. Lust asserts that porn made for men and porn made for women are different kinds of products, and says that, “Women have the right to have our own explicit movies.”
Although Julia Ostertag finds sex in film compelling and thinks of her films as visual experiments or research studies about human desire, identity and sexuality, she doesn’t exist entirely within the realm of pornography. She films explicit sex in her movies, and considers herself to be a female director working with the language of eroticism, but calling her work porn is a bit simplistic. And though she is indeed a female director, she doesn’t see this as a compelling reason to focus exclusively on a female audience.
Ostertag’s first experiment with sex and film involved her own body and sexuality as the subject. The 10 minute short, entitled “Sexjunkie,” is very revealing both physically and emotionally - it’s haunting and sexual, and not at all a commercial porn film. The director has also brought her aesthetic to the commercial porn industry in Germany, where she had to curtail her artistic vision a little bit to give the company what it required. She is currently working on a gritty, independently-produced experimental feature-length narrative film tentatively called “Wasteland,” which Ostertag says is, “About a girl in a post-apocalyptic wasteland area who kills her lovers in different ways after having sex with them.” Though she says that the film is experimental rather than pornographic, it certainly toes the line and won’t shy away from explicit depictions of either sex or violence.
Both Julia Ostertag and Erika Lust have spent the last several years honing their craft, but the results have been very different. Each of the women supports female empowerment for women in erotic films, but the aesthetic and the content of those films ranges from Lust’s tender and playful to Ostertag’s rough and intense. But these visions of sex and sexiness aren’t mutually exclusive - they are part of the fabric of new erotic cinema that is being woven in both Europe and the United States.
Learn more about Erika Lust’s work on her website, http://www.erikalust.com
Learn more about Julia Ostertag’s work on her website, http://www.julia-ostertag.de
Audacia Ray
LiveGirlReview.com
WakingVixen.com
Check out her directorial debut, The Bi Apple!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
