Recession: When casino economy meets real economy
13 June, 2009
Falling economic activity in one or more industries or sectors is not
uncommon even during more general periods of sustained economic growth.
As an example manufacturing employment in the UK fell from 4.5 million
to 3.2 million (1) between 1997 and 2007 - a 10 year period over which
UK-wide economic growth rose by a robust 3% per annum on average in
real terms (2).
It is however rare for a sub sector to cause the whole economy to go
into recession. However, this is exactly what’s happened during the
current financial crisis and subsequent recession. The collapse of high
risk ‘sub-prime’ lending in the USA exposed the fragility and global
interdependence of financial markets.The failure of this specific area
of finance initiated a chain reaction that resulted in, until recently,
highly profitable century-old global financial institutions filing for
bankruptcy, sometimes, overnight. In the UK, Northern Rock, a bank from
the North East of England, went bankrupt, after which other banks were
kept afloat only as a result of Government bail-outs and
guarantees.With domestic and international financial sectors in
turmoil, the many heavily indebted businesses found it difficult to
raise funds while debt-ridden individuals could no longer afford to
borrow to finance unsustainable consumption levels.The subsequent fall
in demand for consumer goods led to production cut-backs and rising
unemployment. In the fourth quarter of 2008 the UK economy was
officially in recession - defined as two quarters of negative economic
growth. This is how the casino financial economy initiated and caused a
devastating recession in the real economy.
DEBT FUELLED GROWTH
The finance sector (comprising mainly of banking, finance and insurance
industries) has grown in significance in the last decade.While the
manufacturing sector was in terminal decline, jobs in finance grew from
5 million to 6.6 million between 1997 and 2007 (1), accounting for 1 in
5 of all jobs in the UK. It is no coincidence that debt levels over
this period also surged.
Britain’s total debt exploded during the economic boom.The total debt
owed by government, businesses and individuals - commonly known as
gross external debt - rose from 1.7 trillion in 1997 to £5.7 trillion
in 2007, an increase of 238% (3). It was this astounding growth in debt
from all sections of society that propelled continuous economic growth
over the last decade.At the end of 2007, Britain’s total external debt
stood at over 400% of GDP (the total value of goods and services
produced by the UK) of approximately £1.5 trillion per annum. That’s
equivalent to a debt of £94,000 for every man, woman and child in the
UK. Indeed, this was in 2007 before the onset of the financial crisis
and the bank bail-outs which have been largely funded by government
borrowing. Given the estimated £1.5 trillion in new government debt to
prop up banks during 2008 (4) UK debt per capita is estimated to
comfortably exceed £100,000.
Household spending, which accounts for two thirds of all expenditure in
the UK economy, was financed by cheap and easy credit following the
deregulation of banking during the 1980s.When people ran out of income
and savings to buy Banks encouraged the spending binge by offering ever
greater credit to ever more riskier debtors. Banks made huge profits,
with bankers earning colossal bonuses, and justified such lending
arguing their new business models had diversified debtor risk by
packaging riskier debt in the form of collateralised debt obligations
(or CDO’s) and other such instruments. Governments encouraged these
‘gambling’ practices, no doubt allured by the prospects of greater tax
revenues from the extraordinary profit-making banking sector and the
not coincidental simultaneous property and asset booms, by further
loosening banking regulation 5) to accommodate new banking ‘business
models’
BANKING - THE FALSE ECONOMY
Bust followed boom in common with the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s as asset
bubbles (over priced property and share values) burst. However unlike
the recent recessions, but not for the first time, the recession was
associated with a collapse in the financial sector.
So-called financial assets like CDO’s, mortgaged debt obligation, and
credit default swaps could not find willing buyers and proved to be
effectively worthless, resulting in huge shortfalls in bank balance
sheets.The previously acclaimed highly efficient banking business model
proved unworkable as credit become scarce (liquidity crisis) when banks
stopped lending to one another because each was protecting its own
assets and no one trusted the value of the collateral they previously
lauded. Banks worth multi-billions of dollars in market capitalisation
filed for bankruptcy overnight as share values fell when investors
realised the false and hollow nature of banking assets.This had a
negative feedback effect as banking stocks and shares were the very
‘assets’ that the financial sector relied upon to prop up company
balance sheets and so market capitalisation was further
undermined.Together these events precipitated a systemic collapse of
the whole interdependent financial system. More banks teetered on the
edge of collapse. Free market economists, capitalist thinkers and
political commentators paradoxically yet vociferously argued ‘banks
were too big to fail’ implying the ramifications of banking failures
were too monstrous to imagine.The government obliged their friends and
close allies in banking and committed trillions of tax payer money to
fully bailing-out the banking sector using loans, government guarantees
and the buying up of so-called toxic (worthless) banking assets despite
undermining competitiveness in the sector and encouraging banks to
behave even more recklessly.
The financial sector had epitomised capitalism in terms of values,
culture, policies and outlook more than any other sector in the
economy.The systemic and fatal collapse of finance was thus a clear and
damning indictment of capitalism itself.
FINANCE AND THE REAL ECONOMY
With the finance sector barely able to stand on its own feet how was it
to continue to fuel the debt ridden economy. Despite central banks
individually and collectively lowering interest rates (the cost of
capital or borrowing) and pumping trillions of public money into the
financial market to kick start lending, banks simply hoarded the funds
to cover for their worthless collateralised assets which severely
depleted their balance sheets. Businesses and households that had
relied on borrowing to fund their spending, found credit more difficult
to access. Since credit was fuelling economic growth this directly
impacted on the real economy as spending on goods and services dropped,
prices fell, and with it company profitability, thereby forcing
businesses to cut back production and staff.
The biggest falls in economic activity have been in consumer goods:
cars and ‘white goods’ such as washing machines and fridges.These are
primarily financed by credit and in recent years loan agreements have
been designed to be more manageable and more readily available to
entice an ever greater number of households to continue to buy what
they don’t need so that companies can maintain high and more profitable
production growth schedules. Though this model of capitalist economic
growth is clearly unsustainable, it has devastating consequences, as it
causes a downward negative economic spiral.When production falls
unemployment rises which in turn causes lower spending on goods and
services, lower production and more unemployment.The economic decline
quickly becomes more widespread and more prevailing, generating its own
negative momentum. At the start of 2009 unemployment in the UK
officially rose to 2 million and is forecast to rise to 3 million
before the end of the year.The UK economy is presently forecast to
contract by 3% in 2009 and remain in decline in 2010. These are
probably optimistic forecasts given that official forecasts have been
downgraded several times already since the start of the crisis.
HUMAN CONSEQUENCES OF THE RECESSIONARY CRISIS
Capitalists view recessions in cold and calculated terms quantifying
only the loss (destruction) of wealth and property - the number of jobs
lost and business closures. However, recessions have huge social as
well as economic consequences. Presently, unemployment is rising
throughout the UK, across all sectors and industries.A loss of
livelihood has huge ramifications for individuals, families,
communities and society at large. Some communities will be blighted for
decades as in previous recessions - for example coal mining communities
remain largely ruined from the recession in the 1980s .Tens of
thousands of families unable to pay their debts have already lost their
homes and possessions. Some have even committed suicide unable to bear
the consequences of their debts and a loss of livelihood. Job
insecurity exists even among those who are still employed who fear that
they may be next to be made redundant. During recessions government tax
receipts drop while expenditure rises due to benefit payments to the
unemployed and poor. Central and local government claw back funding
from elsewhere by cutting back expenditure on schools and hospitals,
assistance for the elderly and help for the weak and vulnerable - for
example cut backs in local meals-on-wheels for the elderly and less
funding for local libraries. Economically strained times lead to
increasing demands on public services like police and hospitals from
accelerating crime and rising stress levels and a general physical and
mental deterioration in health. Family relationships tend to strain
during recessionary times with potentially painful and lasting impacts
on children. Thus recessions spread insecurity and instability
contributing to a plethora of social ills.
ISLAM’S ECONOMIC APPROACH
In Islam the success of the economy is not judged by the size of GDP.
High GDP in the UK, equating to income per head of £24,000 per annum,
among the highest in the world, conceals the heavily debt ridden
economy. Importantly, GDP or income per head says little about the
distribution of wealth.This is exemplified by the fact that according
to government data nearly 3 million children in the UK live in relative
poverty (6) in spite of high GDP levels and growth rates.
In contrast to Capitalism, the success of the economic model in Islam
is judged by its ability to secure the satisfaction of the basic needs
of every citizen.
Bukhari narrated from Ibn Umar:The Prophet (sallallahu alaihi wasallam) said: “The Imam is in charge (ra’i) and he is responsible for his citizens.”
The Prophet (saw) also said: “Do you have, son
of Adam, of your property except that which you ate and consumed, that
which you wore and exhausted, and that which you donated and kept (for
yourself)?”
Islam’s focus is on the real economy which is the wealth creating
aspect of any economy. Finance in Islam is not an end in itself as
there is no interest (Riba). “That is because they say: “Trading is only like Riba,” whereas Allah has permitted trading and forbidden Riba” [Surah al-Baqarah]
While finance plays an important role in business and economics in
Islam it is exclusively (6) in the context of partnerships where the
financial contributing partner(s) are involved with the ‘body’ (those
running the day to day business) partners aiming to generate a profit
from their business activities or sharing the loss if the business
fails.
In contrast to capitalism, finance in Islam is intrinsically tied to
the real economy and does not become an industry in itself.This
eliminates the potential for generating self-destructive financial
instruments that have been so pivotal in the collapse of the capitalist
financial sector.
The prohibition of interest works in tandem with the ruling that the
monetary unit in Islam is effectively the gold and silver standard and
this prohibits credit creation.Thus the monetary base of the economy in
Islam changes only with growth in the real economy through the creation
of wealth or increase in productivity.This minimises inflationary
pressures; provides economic stability and ensures sustainable growth
without the destructive boom and bust cycle.
CONCLUSION
Capitalism’s flaws and systemic failures have been clearly exposed by
the current crisis.The capitalist economic model, therefore, does not
deserve to be emulated by the Muslim world. By contrast, the Islamic
ideology and rulings provide real practical solutions to the economic
problems of the day.The Islamic economic system with its focus on the
real (not financial) economy has withstood the test of time, and with
the money supply tied to gold and silver provides a model of
sustainable and responsible growth, with distribution of the nations
wealth at its core.
Notes:
1. Workforce jobs by industry : United Kingdom: Thousands: Seasonally
adjusted
http://www.statistics.gov.uk/STATBASE/tsdataset.asp?vlnk=495&More=N&All=Y
2. GVA at Basic Prices, Seasonally adjusted http://www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/TSDdownload2.asp
3. Pink Book http://www.statistics.gov.uk/StatBase/TSDSelection1.asp
4. Business.scotsman.com http://business.scotsman.com/lloydstsb/Banks--add--1.5000273.jp
5. Basel II Banking Accords
6. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6497981.stm
7. Muslims are allowed to borrow and lend money without interest only