Why is Bush so obsessed with ungrateful foreigners?
18 March, 2007

A Debt of GratitudeWhy is Bush so obsessed with ungrateful foreigners?


What is it with George W. Bush and his insistent demand for the gratitude of foreigners?

In São Paulo, Brazil, last week, on the first day of his Latin America tour, the president said, "I don't think America gets enough credit for trying to improve people's lives."

The complaint was reminiscent of earlier expressions of pique.

In his memoir of his year in Baghdad as head of the Coalition Provisional Authority, L. Paul Bremer recalled that President Bush once told him that the leader of a new Iraqi government had to be "someone who's willing to stand up and thank the American people for their sacrifice in liberating Iraq."

Bremer noted that Bush made this point three times in the course of a single conversation and further insisted that the president of Iraq's first interim government should be Ghazi al-Yawar, an obscure Sunni Arab businessman, because Bush "had been favorably impressed with his open thanks to the Coalition."

 

Source: Slate Magazine

Link: http://www.slate.com/id/2161644/ 

 (More)
Posted by blogerette 06:54 | Randomness | Comment(0) | Permalink
In Lice, Clues to Human Origin and Attire
08 March, 2007

One of the more embarrassing mysteries of human evolution is that people are host to no fewer than three kinds of louse while most species have just one.

Even bleaker for the human reputation, the pubic louse, which gets its dates and residence-swapping opportunities when its hosts are locked in intimate embrace, does not seem to be a true native of the human body. Its closest relative is the gorilla louse. (Don’t even think about it.)

Louse specialists now seem at last to have solved the question of how people came by their superabundance of fellow travelers. And in doing so they have shed light on the two major turning points in the history of fashion: when people lost their body hair, and when they first made clothing.

Three kinds of louse call Homo sapiens their home, but each occupies a different niche on the human body. The head louse, Pediculus humanus, lives in the forest of fine hairs on the scalp. Its cousin, the body louse, lives not on the skin but in clothes. And the exclusive territory of the pubic louse, Phthirus pubis, is the coarser hairs of the crotch.

Lice are intimately adapted to their hosts and cannot long survive away from the body’s blood and warmth. If their host evolves into two species, the lice will do likewise. So biologists have long been puzzled over the fact that the human head louse is a sister species to the chimpanzee louse, but the pubic louse is closely related to the gorilla louse.

By comparing louse DNA, a team led by David L. Reed of the University of Florida has now reconstructed how this strange situation probably came about. Dr. Reed’s team collected pubic lice from a public health clinic in Salt Lake City. Samples of gorilla lice were obtained by members of the Mountain Gorilla Veterinary Project, which provides free health care to gorillas in the wild.

The number of DNA differences between the gorilla louse and the pubic louse indicates that they diverged some 3.3 million years ago, Dr. Reed and colleagues report in today’s issue of the journal Biomed Central Biology. Among people, the pubic louse is usually spread by sexual contact, but the gorilla louse could have been contracted in some other way.

“We’ll never know if it was sex or something more tame,” Dr. Reed said. What can be said about the transfer, he believes, is that it signals human ancestors had already lost their body hair by 3.3 million years ago, confining the human louse to the head and leaving the groin open to invasion by the gorilla louse.

Archaeologists contend that human ancestors lost their standard ape body hair when they left the shade of the forests for the hot, open savanna and needed bare skin for efficient sweating. Adaptation to the savanna was well in place by 1.7 million years ago. But loss of body hair could have begun earlier, and Dr. Reed’s result suggests a time for when people first became naked.

If people first became nudists 3.3 million years ago, when did they start to wear clothes? Surprisingly, lice once again furnish the answer. Though humans may long have worn loose garments like animal skin cloaks, the first tailored clothing would have been close-fitting enough to tempt the head louse to expand its territory. It evolved a new variety, the body louse, with claws adapted for clinging to fabric, not hairs.

In 2003, Mark Stoneking, a geneticist at the Max Planck Institute in Leipzig, Germany, estimated from DNA differences that the body louse evolved from the head louse about 107,000 years ago. The first sewn clothes were presumably made shortly before this time.

 

Probing back even earlier in louse evolution, Dr. Reed and his colleagues report that the two species of primate lice, Pediculus and Phthirus, probably diverged from each other on an ape host 13 million years ago. The divergence may have happened after the lice started to specialize in different parts of the body.

Some seven million years ago, this ancient ape species split into gorillas and the ancestors of humans and chimps, with both lineages infected by both species of lice. But Pediculus then fell extinct in its gorilla hosts, according to Dr. Reed’s reconstruction, and Phthirus vanished from the chimp-human ancestor. Next, chimps and humans diverged, and their joint louse diverged with them into Pediculus humanus and Pediculus schaeffi.

The last event in this history of human-louse cohabitation was the transfer of the gorilla’s Phthirus louse to people.

Dr. Stoneking said Dr. Reed’s reconstruction was “pretty reasonable” and said he agreed that acquisition of the gorilla’s louse indicated people had lost their body hair by then. “The transfer doesn’t have to be sexual,” he said, “but presumably it does require reasonably close contact.”

 

Source: New York Times

Link:http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/science/08louse.html?_r=1&oref=slogin 

Posted by blogerette 08:58 | Randomness | Comment(1) | Permalink
Are You Addicted to the Internet?
04 March, 2007

 

 

Here is another one that is so true:

 

You Are 81% Addicted to the Internet

The internet is your life - seriously.
You spend so much time online, you should be a dot com millionaire!
Posted by blogerette 08:23 | Randomness | Comment(0) | Permalink
What Famous Work of Art Are You?
04 March, 2007

 

Hello everyone... I did this quiz and it turned out to be fun, actually. I know this isn't the type of posts I'd publish, but change is always good. Break a cycle today. 

 

 

 

 

 

You Are Best Described By...

From the Lake, No. 1
by Georgia O'Keeffe

Posted by blogerette 08:20 | Randomness | Comment(0) | Permalink
A service provided by Al Bawaba