Laptop Battery dell laptop battery Hp laptop battery Sony laptop battery Toshiba Laptop Battery Fujitsu Laptop Battery IBM Laptop Battery Apple Laptop Battery Acer Laptop Battery Asus Laptop Battery Compaq Laptop Battery
01 September, 2009
"The United States Energizer Holdings, has told the U.S. Federal Circuit Court for further laptop battery proceedings, but this time the defendant will be the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). We are prepared to participate in the respondent, the greater chance of winning." At the American Enterprise "337 investigation "won the first battle of the enterprises involved in the case of one of the Nanfu Battery Ching-Wei Kang, general manager of the Secretary told reporters.
Yesterday, this reporter witnessed an interview to the "337 investigation" by Wei Kang. He said, ITC announced on the 1st of this month, the United States Energizer has a mercury-free alkaline battery patent is invalid patents, our nine respondent companies did not constitute battery to its patent infringement. This is the first time Chinese enterprises in recent years, U.S. companies use "337 investigation" cases of victory. On the sixth day thereafter, the United States Energizer to the dell 312-0386 battery U.S. Federal Circuit Court of Appeal. But the United States Energizer this time the defendant was ITC, Nanfu main job is to actively preparing to participate in responding.
Wang Jingzhong Secretary-General of China Battery Industry Association, said the battery from the first appearance of the Chinese point of view, this time they have won a great grasp.
Deer battery relevant person in charge also told reporters that being the last to help us win the lawsuit in accordance with the United States Hogan. Hartson lawyer Yang Weining prepared to participate actively responding to the request and sent the company's active support group of experts. Yang Weining also said that even if the Energizer is successful, the case is also very likely to return to ITC re-acceptance, during which do not know how many years, while the patent is valid for a period of time, the Chinese batteries dell PC764 battery have enough time to fully occupy the U.S. market.
It is reported that "337 investigation" than "anti-dumping" more powerful, once lost, it will clutch the throat of China's battery business. China is the battery power, the battery produces the world's 1 / 3, while 70% of the products for export of mercury-free alkaline battery, as favored by the foreign environment-friendly products are the main products exported to the U.S..
Industry analysis, once accused of setting up, ITC exclusion order will be promulgated, this would mean: in the applicant before the patent expires November 15, 2011, China's export enterprises will be the battery can no longer export of any U.S. mercury-free dell TD175 battery alkaline manganese batteries; right have entered the United States and inventory of products will be based on ITC's restraining order destruction. More seriously, the United States mercury-free alkaline manganese batteries "337" is not only against the defendant company, alkaline manganese batteries in China is also a challenge to the entire industry, but will involve the battery and battery supporting electronic products.
Event Playback
April 28, 2003, the United States Energizer to the ITC complaint, claiming that mainland China and Hong Kong and Japan, Indonesia and other countries and regions, 24 enterprises dell Latitude D820 battery against its mercury-free alkaline battery patent to require those enterprises involved in a "337 investigation. " May 27, the filing investigation begins.
June 2, 2004, the U.S. ITC preliminary ruling affirmed that the Chinese production of the nine mercury-free alkaline battery constitutes a patent infringement. June 9, Chinese companies have joined together to appeal for ITC to conduct a comprehensive review of the preliminary results. October 4, ITC has formally announced the US Energizer mercury-free alkaline battery patent is invalid patents. ITC is also the second time in nearly 30 years to overthrow the administrative law judge's initial ruling, the plaintiff to make the final ruling the dell Latitude D830 battery patent is invalid