Daniel Akill's Blog | 149: RUSSIA READY TO SUPPORT SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN

149: RUSSIA READY TO SUPPORT SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN – ENVOY

28 February, 2008

RUSSIA READY TO SUPPORT SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN – ENVOY AFP via Yahoo News Alerts Wed. 27^th February 2008

MOSCOW: Russia is ready to support new UN sanctions against Iran if Teheran does not change tack on its nuclear programme; Russia's envoy to the UN, Vitaly Churkin, told journalists on Wednesday.

Asked if Russia would support sanctions – via a video conference from New York – Churkin said: “Yes. If Iran does not change its position in the next few days, Russia, as a member of the group of six UN Security Council permanent members plus Germany, will support the UN resolution.”

Western powers have stepped up efforts to impose a third set of UN Security Council sanctions over Iran's nuclear programme in response to Teheran's refusal to suspend uranium enrichment, a potential weapons-making process.

Moscow has relatively close ties with Iran, and Western powers worry that Iran may be trying to develop a nuclear weapons programme under cover of its stated goal of developing civilian nuclear power.

Iran denies having any such weapons programme

Russia has been supplying nuclear fuel for a nuclear power station that Moscow is building at Bushehr in the Islamic republic, and is committed to also removing spent fuel.

Some time ago, there was a report in the foreign and domestic papers with a picture showing Putin and Ahmedinejad and one other Ape; after an agreement on nuclear co-operation between Russia and Iran. Trust the Russians to first sell nuclear stuff to Iran for money, then turn around and join in preventing Iran from using the stuff as it wants. Let me draw your attention to the following headlines which also appeared in newspapers at home and abroad quite some time ago:

A UN WATCH-DOG REPORT FOUND IRAN GENERALLY TRUTHFUL ABOUT THE KEY ASPECTS OF ITS NUCLEAR HISTORY

IRAN DEMANDS APOLOGY FOR WRONG NUCLEAR ACCUSATIONS

IRAN’S AND THE IAEA’S SCAMSaturday, 17^th Nov. 2007

What does ‘a UN Watchdog report found Teheran GENERALLY TRUTHFUL about the KEY ASPECTS of ITS NUCLEAR HISTORY’ mean exactly?

To the average, decent, and sensible person, it simply means that ‘Teheran was NOT PARTICULARLY TRUTHFUL about the KEY-AND-LOCK ASPECTS as opposed to the KEY ASPECTS only – of what use is THE KEY without THE LOCK since THE KEY is light and can be carried around, and lost, too, and although THE LOCK is FIXED or INSTALLED there, IT CAN BE BROKEN OR REMOVED AND REPLACED?

The average decent and sensible person knows fully well that: GENERALITIES ARE MEANINGLESS! IT IS THE PARTICULAR IN LIFE THAT IS MEANINGFUL!

The report also stated the there had been Relative Co-operation and Relatively Realistic Indications to that effect. What do ‘Relative Co-operation’ and ‘Relatively Realistic’ mean? ‘Relative’ to ‘Whom’ and/or "What"

Relative to Mohammed Baradei’s and his Team’s pockets or bank accounts; or relative to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s budget; or perhaps Mahmoud should have paid them more? Is that it?

What does ‘The IAEA’s insight into Iran’s present atomic work – in other words; Nuclear Programme – is shrinking’ mean? This clause was inserted into the report to cover their asses in advance because it simply means that The IAEA’s access to Iran’s Nuclear Programme was, and is, and will always be stringently LIMITED to only what Mahmoud wants them to access!

Not all of us are………

We all know what ‘The Islamic Republic – or Iran – continues to defy UNSC and the IC demands that IT freeze ITS Uranium Enrichment Programme’ means; what are we; Etc, and so forth and so on?

Finally, what does ‘Iran’s history of Black Market Procurements – or Black Market Deals – and Past Development of Uranium Enrichment Technology’ mean; Technological Enrichment of Uranium for what purposes exactly?

Furthermore, let me remind all of you out there that Syria had a nuclear plant or facility going – begun in 2003 or (much) earlier – and which was (almost) fully completed and probably operational, AND! NO ONE KNEW ABOUT IT, INCLUDING THE STUPID, USELESS, HOPELESS BUT COSTLY UN AND THE IC AND, ESPECIALLY, THE BLIND, DEAF, GULLIBLE, IDIOTIC, MORONIC, AND OBTUSE IAEA – I do not believe for one moment that they did not know about it! They knew, but they were paid and told to look the other way with both eyes – until the Israeli Air-force bombed it not so long ago; and which, by the way, dear readers and fellow-Apes, is being rebuilt by Syria again!

AND! Would you believe that neither The UN, nor The IC, nor The UNSC, nor The IAEA even bothered to send a team to check out and investigate the remains?

They waited until Syria had cleared up and cleaned up the area and removed any and all traces of anything – I wouldn’t be surprised if THEY actually advised her to do it – and now they think and believe that only God and Syria and Israel know the truth; they couldn’t be more wrong, because not all of us are Etc, and so forth and so on. And now, instead of checking on what exactly Syria is doing or building, they wait, and look on with one eye, and look the other way with the other eye. AND! If Israel manages to bomb the same project again, they’ll start FARTING FROM BOTH ENDS!

Actually, even if Iran had been, or is, working toward nuclear weapons, THEY – Mohammed Baradei and The IAEA, The UN, The IC, The IAEA, The UNSC, The EU, and The Arab League of Notions – WOULD BE THE LAST TO KNOW! No. Scratch that. The IAEA is the last to know; or the first to know but the last to show; if the price of not-know and not-show is right!

AS FOR THE IAEA; THEY WOULD BE – IN FACT, THEY ARE THE FIRST TO KNOW, BUT – THE LAST TO ADMIT AND/OR TELL! BY GOD!

Posted by akill 09:19 | General | Comment(0) | Permalink

Comments